Melpomene ( @Melpomene@kbin.social ) 99•2 years agoThe best anyone can do right now is to migrate off of Twitter entirely. As long as Musk is in charge (or in charge through his puppet CEOs) the site will be a cesspool of toxicity and hate. I’m honestly not sure why reputable people are still using the site… guess the view and media exposure are better than doing the right thing and leaving?
Traumkaempfer ( @Traumkaempfer@fedia.io ) 27•2 years agoAnyone who is still on Twitter has, in my opinion, fewer issues with being a corporate puppet and being associated with all the hatred there than they have with losing views.
Skyler ( @Skyler@kbin.social ) 26•2 years agoI have (had?) plenty of friends on Twitter who loudly proudly boycotted the Harry Potter game due to JKR’s comments about trans people.
But they’ve stayed on Twitter despite its horrible owner and how he runs things.
I’m willing to give a pass to creators who make a living off their online audience. If the audience went off Twitter, so would they.
Everyone else, though? I don’t ever care to hear about what they’re boycotting again if they can’t pull themselves off Twitter.
TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 7•2 years agoI don’t agree with that logic because that means whenever horrible people buy off a platform, even if you do not pay for it, you are obligated to leave rather than push back. There are people who spent decades cultivating their community before Elon Musk had any interest in it. There are people who are right now pushing back against the rise of hate in it. It seems like a Catch-22 where the person either gives up their platform or they are discredited. The end result either way is that Musk’s crowd wins.
Skyler ( @Skyler@kbin.social ) 23•2 years agorather than push back.
Elon Musk owns Twitter. Every single time a person tweets some kind of “push back,” it’s just more activity on the platform that Elon Musk owns.
Question for you: Would you say all the pushback has been working? Because it seems like every comment out of Elon Musk’s mouth is worse.
TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 3•2 years agoWell, given how saddled with debt the place was it wouldn’t be hard to argue that more activity in fact only burdens him more. It’s not a sustainable or profitable place. I also don’t think advertisers will be to thrilled by the activity of shit constantly being flung everywhere.
But more than that, it is a social media platform, not a shop. I think there is inherent value in the people who stay there and highlight the issues going on regarding hate speech and political manipulation, rather than they all leave. That would allow hateful people to mold the platform around a whole lot of clueless people who don’t realize what is going on, and might just go along with it because they are immersed in this environment. Twitter is not made exclusively of bigots, but it could become more like that over time.
Sure there is no amount of tweets that will stop Elon Musk’s mad spiral. But his reputation definitely took some hits.
As far as it compares with JK Rowling, I also think it’s not the same. Say, if we were to compare, as far as engagement and community goes, I wouldn’t expect anyone to drop all their friends and groups they make through their shared love of Harry Potter just because the author is awful.
If anything I’m a bit suspicious from where first came this call for complete disengagement. Because if there are no voices calling for inclusivity and respect in social media platforms and fandoms, they just become breeding grounds for hate.
Skyler ( @Skyler@kbin.social ) 10•2 years agoIf anything I’m a bit suspicious from where first came this call for complete disengagement.
lol, seriously? Musk wants to disable blocking on Twitter, while continuing to ratchet up the transphobia.
You’re truly suspicious about people not wanting to wallow in a cesspool of hate?
TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 2•2 years agoI’m also on Kbin so you can guess what’s my stance on remaining in bad platforms.
But these are two different arguments: Whether it’s sensible for people to leave, or whether they are obligated out of moral consistency to leave.
Absolutely people have plenty of reasons not want to wallow there and I wouldn’t in a million years say anything bad to anyone who wants to leave. But I also wouldn’t shame those who want to push back against hate, who want to protect the following they gathered, or who want to support the creators who didn’t find an adequate place to rebuild their online presence yet.
What I am suspicious of is from whoever came up with this argument “if you are so opposed to bigots, how about you leave this platform” when the end result is that many of these same marginalized people targeted by hate speech might have less reach because of it.
Eddie ( @FVVS@l.lucitt.com ) 9•2 years agoI think you’re overthinking this. Twitter used to be a place where I could keep up with my friends. Now, it’s a place filled with many forms of hate. Because of this, I no longer wish to use it, so I left.
I personally have no care in the world for what happens with Twitter. Why should I? It becomes overrun with bigots? So what?
Remaining on a platform filled with hate is an indicator that you’re ok with that. I am not, so I left. end of story.
TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 1•2 years agoThis is not someone randomly joining Parler. Not only minorities don’t always have the luxury to only exist where they are welcomed, they had been accepted and that was taken away from them. They already had built their following and that’s being ruined. To say that trying to hold onto what they’ve built and resist is “being okay with hate” doesn’t sound right to me.
Twitter as a place does not matter to me, but I still have friends and creators that I like that use it, and especially for artists, they need a platform with wide reach for their careers. I can preach the Fediverse and Mastodon as much as I want, but until it’s widely adopted, it’s not going to help them.
Zetaphor ( @Zetaphor@zemmy.cc ) English6•2 years agoThere are people who are right now pushing back against the rise of hate in it.
To what end? What do they really hope to accomplish?
It’s owned by a bigot who is making both social and corporate changes to explicitly signal to and allow other bigots to take over the platform. They’re pulling back on moderation and firing all of the people who prevented it from becoming even more of a cesspool. What chance do a bunch of people tweeting about how things should change have against the person who literally runs the platform and his toxic fanatic horde?
I understand that a lot of people have spent a lot of time on there and so it may feel hard to let go, but at this point it’s it’s beyond a lost cause and any further effort is just a sunk cost fallacy. You have to know when to realize that everything around you is on fire and that bucket of water you’re holding isn’t going to make any difference.
This is why decentralized and federated platforms like Mastodon and Lemmy are the only real answer. Otherwise you’re just swimming in someone else’s pool and hoping they don’t shit in it.
The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) 6•2 years agoThis is to my eyes the core problem with centralized corporate social networks. Ultimately, where you intend it or not, your presence is in support to the core mission of the corporate entity holding the platform. Twitter has 16 years of history at this point, and I think can be viewed in three periods. First was the tech experiment to bring online interactions more into the real world. This was Twitter’s shortest period. It lasted a month or so at most. In this phase, the mission was to create a bridge between online interactions and real world experiences using cell phone technology. Second was the venture capital chasing profits period. This was the longest and least successful period of Twitters history. In this phase, the mission was to make some money. I don’t think Twitter had a mission beyond that, and that ultimately they tried to curate an environment that would appease advertisers and drive engagement (even if it was mostly through outrage). In this phase, I don’t hold all that much against anyone who engaged with the platform. I don’t think Twitter was doing anything egregiously unethical (beyond the usual bullshit every tech company does). I lost interest in Twitter in this timeframe because the outrage engagement model bummed me out. All this brings us to now…
At this point. Twitter is Elon Musk’s personal messaging platform. Its purpose is to inflate and normalize Elon Musk’s world view, and those of his cronies. Anyone who remains on the platform his helping him and his shift right mission, preferring to respect the requests of authoritarian right wing governments vs common sense consumer protections requested by more free governments. There are people on Twitter who disagree with this, but their presence still supports Musk in his mission. Whether you were there before Musk or not is immaterial. Its his personal platform, and it’s for his mission
TwilightVulpine ( @TwilightVulpine@kbin.social ) 1•2 years agoThis is definitely an example of the risks of privately owned social media.
But to say that remaining on the platform is helping him just seems like oversimplifying the matter. What is more likely to advance the spread of his views? If the platform is left solely to his supporters and people oblivious or indifferent to the changes of the platform, or if there are still people denouncing and criticizing it? Seems naive to assume all it takes is for everyone against hate to leave one of the most influential media platforms of these times and its radicalization will have no further effects at all.
All that seems to accomplish is the peace of mind that you are not involved and experiencing the direct effects of it.
ArghZombies ( @ArghZombies@beehaw.org ) 4•2 years agoYeah, I’m still there. I’m not letting the right-wing trolls win. I’m there until it implodes.
Much like Reddit, if you curate your feed, stay away from the big accounts and avoid the Trending Topics and don’t talk politics then it’s still a decent place to be.
deelightful ( @deelightful@kbin.social ) 1•2 years agoYeah, I do still have my twitter account but I try to avoid going on it and only still have it because there are a few niche times where it’s still unfortunately the best place to get current information on local issues (last Sunday for example there was a power outage in my area and the power company’s twitter is a bit better at giving updates than their official site so I was checking both).
I really wish I could just delete my account and maybe I still will (and just create an empty dummy account for those rare cases so twitter doesn’t harass me to log in). But to be honest I’m less stressed about social media in general ever since I left twitter and I suspect over time a similar thing will happen with being off Reddit.
HTTP_404_NotFound ( @xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com ) 10•2 years agoWe (most of the people here), already did. Thats how mastadon was born!
The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) 1•2 years agoI’m thankful to the great Twitter exodus of 2022, it made the mastodon space a much more interesting space. I’d been playing with mastodon since 2016 at the latest, but finally having people to interact with who weren’t just talking about federation, privacy tools, and tech stuff was a breath of fresh air. Granted, I’m already more active here in the threadiverse than I ever was on mastodon, but I think these two exoduses have the potential to really give people a chance to expand their horizons. I see people talk sometimes about how mastodon users dropped off after a montho or two after the twitter buyout, but looking at the graphs, the trend is obvious. Even if monthly active users dropped after the buyout bump, they were still double what they’d been before the buyout. We might see some of the same in this space, and I’m mostly okay with that. If Lemmy / Kbin usage drops 50% it will still be about 100% more active than it was before, and I think the people who are engaged here are really engaged and interested in keeping this going
TwoGems ( @TwoGems@beehaw.org ) 2•2 years agoRabbits
notamichael ( @notamichael@beehaw.org ) English92•2 years agoWhy is everything to do with this story completely unsurprising.
HobbitFoot ( @HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club ) English39•2 years agoBecause we’ve all come to accept that Elon Musk doesn’t know how to run a social media site?
TWeaK ( @TWeaK@lemm.ee ) English20•2 years agoHe knows how to run a social media site into the ground…
Which is probably the whole point. Make it seem like the site is failing because of mismanagement, and not that its failure was intended right from the start with a leveraged buyout saddling the business with an untenable $13bn of debt.
HobbitFoot ( @HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club ) English9•2 years agoNo, he’s just dumb!
tanglisha [she/her] ( @tanglisha@beehaw.org ) English8•2 years agoYup, it’s easy to forget that an important use of Twitter used to be finding out what was happening when propaganda was covering it up. It’s how we learned about Arab spring.
If my life were at risk from my government, I certainly wouldn’t trust Elon to keep me safe from them.
TWeaK ( @TWeaK@lemm.ee ) English7•2 years agoThe Arab Spring is exactly one if the reasons Musk took over the site. That, and Peter Thiel’s (Musk’s old partner from PayPal) failed attempts at setting up a rival service.
They couldn’t rope Twitter into line, they couldn’t make a competing service, so instead they saddled Twitter with $13bn of debt so that it would die (or step into line if they felt like paying off the debt).
It’s the same way Toys R Us went under.
Musk’s antics over the last few months have been nothing but a distraction. The very purchase itself was a death sentence.
Erk ( @Erk@cdda.social ) English4•2 years agoI don’t know that he does.
We’re still hearing about twitter and people are still using it.
I think what we’re learning is that social media has more inertia than we might have thought, and it’s actually incredibly difficult to kill it. This is a very bad thing as it allows someone like Musk to deeply alt-rightify what is fundamentally a public resource in private hands, but people will keep using it because…? I couldn’t tell you why really, and I think most of us that have adopted lemmy are by nature not likely to really understand it.
curiosityLynx ( @curiosityLynx@kbin.social ) 82•2 years agoMusk is a proponent of near-absolute free speech
Anything goes, so long as it doesn’t hurt his feelings personally
Sentinian ( @Sentinian@lemmy.one ) 41•2 years agoAs long as you don’t use the term cisgender :)
Skyler ( @Skyler@kbin.social ) 18•2 years agoPeople are also not allowed to say the word "cisgender” over there
FloatingAlong ( @FloatingAlong@kbin.social ) 17•2 years agoWoah dude, cool it with the c-bombs.
LEGO® Worm™ ( @FedericoSchonborn@beehaw.org ) 27•2 years agoIt’s okay, I gave them a c-word pass.
I_am_10_squirrels ( @I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org ) 17•2 years agoSome of my friends are c-words, so I can use it
pizza_rolls ( @pizza_rolls@kbin.social ) 16•2 years agoOr when an authoritarian government asks him to block literally anything
taanegl ( @taanegl@beehaw.org ) 14•2 years agoFreedom, by Musk… a cologne that’s actually mace with directions to the local old folks home and instructions on how to use InShot.
GunnarRunnar ( @GunnarRunnar@kbin.social ) 14•2 years agoKinda far from absolute imo.
curiosityLynx ( @curiosityLynx@kbin.social ) 21•2 years agoI would claim actual free speech absolutists don’t exist.
GunnarRunnar ( @GunnarRunnar@kbin.social ) 11•2 years agoYou’re probably since those that preach about free speech are politically driven, hence biased to protect their stance. Rest of us have realized speech isn’t free of consequence and the last third just doesn’t give a fuck.
admiralteal ( @admiralteal@kbin.social ) 8•2 years agoDefamation, fraud, hate speech, harassment, collusion, confidentiality, incitement…
No reasonable person actually thinks that free speech is an unlimited right. Plenty of kinds of speech are viewed as too harmful to be legal. The right is well understood to be about political speech only, and even then the edge cases can be hard to pin.
Anyone who claims to be an absolutist on free speech is insane or absolutely full of shit.
50gp ( @50gp@kbin.social ) 3•2 years agoyou forgot the most important one: being negative against musk/spez/freeSpeechAdmin123/insert any other free speech absolutist authority figure here
Traumkaempfer ( @Traumkaempfer@fedia.io ) 9•2 years agoDidn’t he also give in to block a few accounts of political opponents in Turkey instead of risking being banned there completely, because he said it would be better to lose a few accounts instead of losing the whole country?
The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) 1•2 years agoMeanwhile, he’s threatening to leave the EU. It’s clear he actively gives authoritarian regimes preferential treatment and wants free regimes to give him special treatment under the guise that his personal mission is to save the world (much like the Vogons did in Hitchikers Guide (they’re the slug creatures who bulldozed the earth)). He pretends it’s all for progress. It’s all for himself.
glennglog22 ( @glennglog22@kbin.social ) 45•2 years ago“TikTok copycat”
You know, way way back in the pre-Elon days, they had another one. I think it was called Vine?
GunnarRunnar ( @GunnarRunnar@kbin.social ) 15•2 years agoI still don’t understand why they killed it. Must’ve been a real money sink.
zakomo ( @zakomo@beehaw.org ) 33•2 years agohigh costs server side, poor quality of the videos, poor-ish internet connections, not enough powerful cell phones, etc. They were ahead of time. They achieved a decent success in the US but not much outside of it because of much of the reasons listed above.
lackthought ( @lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org ) English7•2 years agoI know peertube already exists, but I wonder if a federated app specifically for short videos (to reduce data storage costs) could find some success?
would probably also need to use some intense video compression technology before upload to further reduce file sizes
lemonadebunny ( @lemonadebunny@lemmy.ca ) English2•2 years agoThere actually is one in development right now! It’s called Goldfish. It’s in pre-alpha right now, but it’s getting somewhere
zakomo ( @zakomo@beehaw.org ) English2•2 years agoIt might but when you get to critical mass (as in big enough to create or attract big names and their following) you wil still be stuck with a huge amount of data. Keep also in mind that big influencers make money out of the platforms they are in so they would not have any incentive to move to the Fediverse unless someone finds a way to monetize it. At that point you have the Meta Threads controversy.
To be perfectly honest an influencer, or a group of influencers, could run their own instance and charge a subscription to follow it or run ads but most people will join a free instance to see the same content; if they defederate to force users to join their instance then they are way less discoverable; if they run ads other admins would defederate for privacy (e.g. Meta Threads); etc.
In short, yes is feasible and someone will do it, on the other side it will need a creative approach to monetization to attract big names and build a consistent user base/fund raising strategy to justify the cost of the infrastructure especially if federated. I hope it will happen, though I am not bright enough to see how.
My major concern with the success of the Fediverse is that socials like Reddit are replaceable if you have enough people to create a stimulating community, socials like TikTok, Instagram and Twitter rely on having people you want to follow in their platform to lure you in and they are much more difficult to replace.
HobbitFoot ( @HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club ) 10•2 years agoYeah, and it closed because they weren’t making money on it. Turns out all you needed was a few years for server costs to go down.
CookieJarObserver ( @CookieJarObserver@feddit.de ) English31•2 years agoElon wanted a worse version of 4chan, Elon gets a worse version of 4chan…
curiosityLynx ( @curiosityLynx@kbin.social ) 6•2 years agoDoes he? Is that even possible?
meat_popsicle ( @meat_popsicle@kbin.social ) 12•2 years ago4chan doesn’t fuck with animal abusers. They fuck their lives up and doxx them.
pizza_rolls ( @pizza_rolls@kbin.social ) 5•2 years ago4chan posts plenty of animal abuse videos because they think it’s funny to make people watch them accidentally
Briongloid ( @briongloid@aussie.zone ) English25•2 years ago adelaide ( @caffeine@lemmy.ml ) English21•2 years agoThe fediverse is looking like the objective best alternative, more so day by day.
floofloof ( @floofloof@lemmy.ca ) English8•2 years agoOne day the far right has to realize we’re here, and they’ll pile in to hurl abuse etc. When that happens I’ll be looking for instances that moderate and defederate them away. I didn’t realize how much that stuff got me down until I came here from reddit and found people having reasonable conversations, just like in the old days. It’s a rare thing to find on today’s internet. Let the commercial sites go after absolute numbers of users while we pursue a better experience.
keeb420 ( @keeb420@kbin.social ) 18•2 years agoare there videos of apes with nualink in their brains?
EnthusiasticWhale ( @EnthusiasticWhale@kbin.social ) 17•2 years agoSystem is working as intended… I guess then huh Elon?
- realcaseyrollins ( @realcaseyrollins@kbin.projectsegfau.lt ) 14•2 years ago
What kinda goofy response was this from Musk? AYO!
Snapz ( @Snapz@beehaw.org ) 38•2 years agoTry not to link if you can, just screenshot or copy text. Don’t need to drive any traffic to that pit of despair.
xavier666 ( @xavier666@lemm.ee ) 6•2 years agoExpected from someone who responds with the 💩 emoji
I actually didn’t find much wrong with that, that was funny. But this here is a completely inappropriate response
The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) 4•2 years agoIt might be a funny way to set up your personal email account you only share with your friends, but it’s a wildly unprofessional thing to do with the PR department’s autoreply
optissima ( @optissima@beehaw.org ) 6•2 years agoHere’s a non-twitter alternative to see the tweet without interacting with twitter (just replace
twitter.com
withnitter.net
) https://nitter.net/elonmusk/status/1673116176757694465
richneptune ( @richneptune@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English13•2 years agoI don’t use Tiktok but I gather that this is a big problem over there as well, so it sounds like Twitter is working just as well as the site it’s riffing off.
fmstrat ( @fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ) English7•2 years agoI don’t either but my understanding from other feedback, and from the article linked, is that no, it’s not a problem there. More accurate algorithm and proper moderation.
richneptune ( @richneptune@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English5•2 years agoit’s not a problem there
It is, because my wife is an avid Tok user and complains about it, and reports it, frequently. She also says there are many animal videos that are “unsettling” but not outright abuse.
FedericoSchonborn ( @FedericoSchonborn@kbin.social ) 10•2 years agoMany reported being alarmed by a stream of graphic videos they encountered while scrolling through the feed, including videos showing gun violence, police brutality, physical altercations and vaccine misinformation.
So it’s working as intended?
- Fizz ( @Fizz@lemmy.nz ) English7•2 years ago
Sounds like tiktok
xc2215x ( @xc2215x@kbin.social ) 6•2 years agoOf course Elon would.
aquarisces ( @aquarisces@kbin.social ) 6•2 years agoSteve “spez” Huffman calls the feature “visionary” and jokes that he wishes some protesting Reddit moderators be featured in the videos.
dianne ( @diannetea@beehaw.org ) 1•2 years agoI honestly can’t even tell if this is serious or not