- underisk ( @underisk@lemmy.ml ) English19•2 years ago
It’s only weird if you think this wasn’t the result they wanted. They don’t just want the ad revenue. They want the user numbers for their IPO and the tons of sellable user data you can collect with a smartphone app.
- Spaceman Spiff ( @Nollij@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English15•2 years ago
Thing is, the slow boil technique is tried and true. Each turn of the crank would only anger a small group, and would ensure the platform remains stable and popular.
A better question is why is this happening all at once? It feels like the top brass had a meeting to discuss options to increase revenue, and just decided “Fuck it. Let’s just do them all”
- norb ( @norb@infosec.pub ) English8•2 years ago
My feeling is they looked at their user numbers, and the specifically those using the API and/or 3rd party apps, and did the calculation to decide that they wouldn’t lose enough people to cause a mass migration.
I think whether that calculation was correct or not still remains to be seen.
- Gradually_Adjusting ( @Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.whynotdrs.org ) English6•2 years ago
A distant cause is likely the changes in monetary policy (rate hikes). The tech sector has been structuring their capital as if borrowing would always be cheap, and they were unprepared for a sudden flight toward sustainable cash flow.
I think their only hope for “fuck you money” at this point is to cash out at IPO and watch it burn.
- underisk ( @underisk@lemmy.ml ) English5•2 years ago
My guess is their funding dried up due to recent financial system instability causing venture capitalists to stop blindly handing out money. That plus the NFT shit they were into suggests they might have had some exposure to the recent crypto fallout as well. The upcoming IPO and the way spez seems determined to see this through no matter what screams looming financial crisis.
- ungoogleable ( @ungoogleable@lemmy.ml ) English4•2 years ago
I think it makes a lot of sense as a series of emotional reactions, mostly from spez. He won’t back down and no one can make him.
They don’t want to serve ads through the API because ad buyers care about exactly how the ads will be presented. The apps would have to work very closely with Reddit to ensure consistent ad presentation, which is more work for them so they don’t want to do it.
The API price was plucked out of thin air, presumably based on what they believed OpenAI/Microsoft/Google would be willing to pay. Third party apps were acceptable collateral damage.
- manitcor ( @manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech ) English1•2 years ago
because the commons is not sustainable as a profit entity, never was. The move to 5%+ rates is pushing every player to “make it” or “die”
reddit is toast.
- Count Regal Inkwell ( @VinesNFluff@pawb.social ) English14•2 years ago
Reddit corporate is not very smart. Never was.
Spez and his mates had proven way back in the early 10s that they had the mindset and attitude of 4chan troll teenagers, despite being business-owning adults.
- laxe ( @laxe@lemmy.ml ) English4•2 years ago
Maybe a jailbait mod who also secretly edits user comments with his admin privileges is not suitable to be CEO.
- pvr ( @pvr@beehaw.org ) English4•2 years ago
I think one of the biggest issues that Reddit has with third party apps is that they don’t have control over the user experience.
I think Reddit is experimenting a lot with their app to see what works and doesn’t work to get new users engaged. Note that I said new users. Reddit doesn’t care about old users. They only care about growing and getting new users engaged.
Reddit implemented features like community chat, community voice/talk spaces, subreddit suggestions, NFTs etc.
I think it’s harder for Reddit to keep experimenting and seeing what sticks when 3rd party apps won’t or don’t implement those features.
So yeah, bottom line is, Reddit wants more control and Reddit wants new users that are engaged.
I understand why they do it. I don’t agree with how they went about it. I’m mostly upset that they think 3rd party apps are riding on Reddits succes when Reddit itself is riding on free user content/moderation/voting. It’s our content and we should be able to consume it the way we want to.
- zhunk ( @zhunk@beehaw.org ) English2•2 years ago
when 3rd party apps won’t or don’t implement those features
A lot of those features weren’t accessible through the API, so the 3rd party apps couldn’t implement them even if they wanted to.
- Shrek ( @psysok@lemmy.ml ) English3•2 years ago
I think they view it as ripping off the bandaid now before their IPO. They probably figured they would lose some single digit % of users that would recover over time, and now they will have full control over the experience with no 3rd party apps, which they will want in order to squeeze more money over time.
- pollocks ( @pollocks@lemmy.ml ) English2•2 years ago
They don’t want some of the money. They want ALL of the money and they have nothing but contempt for their users. They don’t just want a small revenue stream that they need to share with other entities. They want to monetize every aspect of their service and they can only do that if they force users to use their app. They have big plans for the app to make it even shittier I imagine.
- 30021190 ( @30021190@lemmy.cloud.aboutcher.co.uk ) English2•2 years ago
I always thought requiring premium for 3rd party apps would have been the best and easiest move for essentially no actual work.
- guriinii ( @guriinii@lemmy.sdf.org ) English2•2 years ago
They still would have alienated people if they did that. Myself included.
- Captain Jimmy T Kirk ( @Captain_Jimmy_T_Kirk@lemmy.ml ) English1•2 years ago
Not to mention the less tangible costs too, like the company’s reputation and trust.
Or starting a gold rush for reddit competitors that didn’t exist previously.