- cross-posted to:
- lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
As far as I see that instance is a far-right cess pool. Everything I’ve got from that instance were low-quality transphobic “news articles”.
Yes
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 57•1 year ago
Nazis aren’t welcome here, best they learn that now rather than through a long process of being told by everyone else here to fuck off.
- Spaceman Spiff ( @Nollij@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 22•1 year ago
Telling Nazis to fuck off rarely leads to them actually fucking off, because they’re Nazis.
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 12•1 year ago
If enough of the community makes it sufficiently clear that we’re not going to let them peddle their Nazi bullshit unopposed, including by taking whatever moderator actions are possible to get rid of them, most of the Nazis will go somewhere else and we’ll only have to deal with the typical number of Nazis for an internet platform rather than become inundated with them. Making them unwelcome by any means necessary is the name of the game.
- aegisgfx877 ( @aegisgfx877@kbin.social ) 10•1 year ago
then we will scrape them off our shoe as we always do with dog shit
- DrQuint ( @DrQuint@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
I like how you make it sound like they’re a type of vermin.
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
If enough of the community makes it sufficiently clear that we’re not going to let them peddle their Nazi bullshit unopposed, including by taking whatever moderator actions are possible to get rid of them, most of the Nazis will go somewhere else and we’ll only have to deal with the typical number of Nazis for an internet platform rather than become inundated with them. Making them unwelcome by any means necessary is the name of the game.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 7•1 year ago
What’s your definition of a Nazi? A member of a national socialist party? I want to understand what is being banned before it’s banned.
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 18•1 year ago
My criteria for what makes “a Nazi” are something like this.
-
A belief that race is an immutable genetic concept, that reproducing outside one’s race is inherently wrong, and that some races are inherently superior to others; most often the superior groups are “white”, while the “inferior” groups include Africans, Jews and travelling people
-
Reverence for cultural “tradition”, real or imagined, with any departure from these traditions classified as “degenerate” and dangerous to society. For example, a belief that avant-garde art is immoral and without value because it doesn’t root itself in what are popularly perceived to be the artistic traditions of “the west”, a neat line from Greek marble statues to Wagner.
-
Hatred of diversity, seeing it as a plague that rots a society. For example, the belief that women are unfit to hold a social position outside of motherhood, that non-heterosexual sexualities are “degenerate”, that allowing people from another race to exist in your race’s society inevitably leads to that society’s destruction, that gender as a concept is a “mental illness” because only two biological sexes exist and each biological sex has a set-in-stone role demanding a certain presentation and certain values, that societies which follow one religion must not allow followers of another religion to exist within it.
-
Heavy use of absolutism. Everything is either wholly good or wholly bad. Nothing can be a mix of good and bad, or neutral. And everything is a matter of utmost urgency. Anything that is “bad” is an existential threat to all that is “good” and must be immediately and utterly annihilated.
-
An authoritarian outlook. Anything opposed by a Nazi must be forbidden by the full force of the law. There is no space for differences of opinion, or a nuanced debate, or reviewing the facts. If they oppose something, whether it’s big or small - the use of marijuana, reformative justice programs, abortion, media with female protagonists - it must be banned under pain of death.
-
Violence. To a Nazi, the use of violence isn’t an escalation, but the norm. They have no qualms about beating people to death simply for espousing an opposing view, or even just for existing if some aspect of their existence offends their beliefs. Likewise, their rhetoric often alludes to the indiscriminate or nonchalant, even gleeful use of deadly force - “physical removal”, “showers”, etc.
-
Shameless hypocrisy. The people who say “facts not feelings” as a rebuttal are often the same people whose beliefs are motivated almost entirely by feelings, and will happily mock others for trying to use evidence in their arguments instead of simply saying “it’s common sense”. They will shame someone for being rude and aggressive while also calling them the N word and telling them that on “the day of the rope”, they’ll be among the dead.
-
Veneration of strong leaders and mocking of “weakness”. Consensus-builders are seen as spineless “cucks”, while people who enforce their every arbitrary whim with total force are held up as “based” exemplars of good leadership and models to be emulated. People who are comfortably being themselves in ways that aren’t conventionally masculine are addressed with slurs and told to kill themselves while ignorant, bullying asshats are applauded for “rustling jimmies”.
You can meet all of these criteria without being a member of a National-Socialist party, or even identifying as a Nazi, but if you do meet most or all of them, your ideology can be pretty confidently described as Nazi-like.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 9•1 year ago
By the way, cheers to you for actually answering the question. I’ve seen “BAN NAZIS” before, but I haven’t really understood what the requestors are looking to ban, and when questioned they seem to disappear quickly.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
This seems pretty well thought out.
I’m a little confused by: “A belief that race is an immutable genetic concept”. If I was born in Spain and my whole family has lived there for centuries, am I not Spanish / a Spaniard?
I’d agree that saying things like “all Spaniards are terrible at math” is racist, but I don’t see how one’s race is mutable in this fashion.
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
I’m a little confused by: “A belief that race is an immutable genetic concept”. If I was born in Spain and my whole family has lived there for centuries, am I not Spanish / a Spaniard?
Spanish would be a good description of your ethnic background in that situation, but there are quite a number of ethnic identities within Spain as well - the Basque, Galicians and Catalans, just to name a few. “Spanish” isn’t a racial monolith. There would be plenty of people whose ethnic background looks quite different to yours but who are no less Spanish.
What I mean in that statement is that Nazis believe that “race” - as in “Germanic”, “Hispanic”, “Black” (they tend to lump all sub-Saharan Africans together), “Middle Eastern” - is a useful way of classifying people, and that substantial differences in things like intelligence and physiology between humans are primarily the result of these categorisations.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
Spanish would be a good description of your ethnic background in that situation, but there are quite a number of ethnic identities within Spain as well - the Basque, Galicians and Catalans, just to name a few. “Spanish” isn’t a racial monolith. There would be plenty of people whose ethnic background looks quite different to yours but who are no less Spanish.
But none of that is mutable, is it?
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
Your DNA isn’t going to change, but those ethnic groups are transient things rather than an inherent feature of reality. An ethnic group is ultimately a relative thing. Some “African-American” people might be genetically closer to the African people from whom their ancestors came than the other ethnic groups living in America, but they’re not simply “African” - they are a separate diaspora. Those ethnic groups change their makeups over time.
It’s not like, say, elements. 1,000 years from now, the average genetic makeup of any given ethnic group will be observably different from how it is today, but a Hydrogen atom will still be defined in exactly the same way as now. Nazis believe that races are a concrete, reified structure that doesn’t shift over time - it is a “pure” and “natural” state that becomes degraded and diluted by what they term miscegenation, rather than a fuzzy construct that changes over time.
Let’s say you were born in Spain and your whole family has lived there for centuries, but your family are black - say, some of your ancestors arrived from North Africa long ago. I would still call you Spanish, but a Nazi would call you African (or more likely some kind of slur). They care about the colour of your skin more than your actual background. Likewise, no matter how many generations your family has lived in a country or how well they pass, Nazis assert that if any of your ancestors was a Jew, you are also a Jew, and that as a Jew, you are inherently inferior to non-Jews and consequently a racial contaminant.
- stonemilker ( @stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•1 year ago
Just adding to this, following this same supposedly biological argument that advocates for a natural and morally correct path for the furthering of genetic lineages, Nazis persecuted homosexuality, bisexuality and trans people as a national policy, shutting down sexology research institutes, literally burning years of scientific advancements, and revoking official acknowledgements the Weimar Republic granted transgender people. It’s often forgotten, but the inherent homophobia, biphobia and transphobia of neonazis and adjacent movements is not a recent development at all: https://www.advocate.com/news/holocaust-lgbtq-victims-german-parliament
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
I wonder how anyone stereotyping individuals based on far-distant ancestors square up these beliefs with hominid evolution. I guess the answer is “they don’t”.
-
- kbity ( @kbity@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
My criteria for what makes “a Nazi” are something like this.
-
A belief that race is an immutable genetic concept, that reproducing outside one’s race is inherently wrong, and that some races are inherently superior to others; most often the superior groups are “white”, while the “inferior” groups include Africans, Jews and travelling people
-
Reverence for cultural “tradition”, real or imagined, with any departure from these traditions classified as “degenerate” and dangerous to society. For example, a belief that avant-garde art is immoral and without value because it doesn’t root itself in what are popularly perceived to be the artistic traditions of “the west”, a neat line from Greek marble statues to Wagner.
-
Hatred of diversity, seeing it as a plague that rots a society. For example, the belief that women are unfit to hold a social position outside of motherhood, that non-heterosexual sexualities are “degenerate”, that allowing people from another race to exist in your race’s society inevitably leads to that society’s destruction, that gender as a concept is a “mental illness” because only two biological sexes exist and each biological sex has a set-in-stone role demanding a certain presentation and certain values, that societies which follow one religion must not allow followers of another religion to exist within it.
-
Heavy use of absolutism. Everything is either wholly good or wholly bad. Nothing can be a mix of good and bad, or neutral. And everything is a matter of utmost urgency. Anything that is “bad” is an existential threat to all that is “good” and must be immediately and utterly annihilated.
-
An authoritarian outlook. Anything opposed by a Nazi must be forbidden by the full force of the law. There is no space for differences of opinion, or a nuanced debate, or reviewing the facts. If they oppose something, whether it’s big or small - the use of marijuana, reformative justice programs, abortion, media with female protagonists - it must be banned under pain of death.
-
Violence. To a Nazi, the use of violence isn’t an escalation, but the norm. They have no qualms about beating people to death simply for espousing an opposing view, or even just for existing if some aspect of their existence offends their beliefs. Likewise, their rhetoric often alludes to the indiscriminate or nonchalant, even gleeful use of deadly force - “physical removal”, “showers”, etc.
-
Shameless hypocrisy. The people who say “facts not feelings” as a rebuttal are often the same people whose beliefs are motivated almost entirely by feelings, and will happily mock others for trying to use evidence in their arguments instead of simply saying “it’s common sense”. They will shame someone for being rude and aggressive while also calling them the N word and telling them that on “the day of the rope”, they’ll be among the dead.
-
Veneration of strong leaders and mocking of “weakness”. Consensus-builders are seen as spineless “cucks”, while people who enforce their every arbitrary whim with total force are held up as “based” exemplars of good leadership and models to be emulated. People who are comfortably being themselves in ways that aren’t conventionally masculine are addressed with slurs and told to kill themselves while ignorant, bullying asshats are applauded for “rustling jimmies”.
You can all of these criteria without being a member of a National-Socialist party, or even identifying as a Nazi, but if you do meet most or all of them, your ideology can be pretty confidently described as Nazi-like.
-
- tookmyname ( @tookmyname@lemmy.ml ) English38•1 year ago
Bigotry should be banned, and removed from this instance. That means not allowing bigotry on our instance. That means defederating from less clever wannabe 4chans, and less moderated The_D replacements.
They can enjoy their shithole federation.
- nothacking ( @nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•1 year ago
Honestly 4chan is much better than some of these instances.
- Milan ( @milan@discuss.tchncs.de ) English32•1 year ago
After a while of thinking and reviewing, I have come to the conclusion to defederate as requested. If they correct course, I’ll happily re-review them.
Thank you
- meldroc ( @meldroc@kbin.social ) 27•1 year ago
Yes, defederate these chuds. Keep them isolated! Don’t let them make this space into a Nazi bar.
- aegisgfx877 ( @aegisgfx877@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
good gawd I just checked out their front page, (puke noise) Hunter Derangement syndrome is real for those chuds
- TimeSquirrel ( @TimeSquirrel@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
“Hunter’s laptop! Hunter’s laptop!”
Normal people: “Who? Oh that guy. Who cares?”
“Buttery malez? Ben Gazi?”
- aegisgfx877 ( @aegisgfx877@kbin.social ) 4•1 year ago
Yet they dont care at all whats on Matt Gatez laptop, or Jareds… what massive tools they are for falling for this utter bs.
- Milan ( @milan@discuss.tchncs.de ) English22•1 year ago
I am trying to examen the instance, it would have been helpful to have some pointers to speed up the process although it somehow sounds like a familiar domain. It sounds like such content at least was against their rules. but that of course does not have to mean much.
Looking at the comments from their team is no good impression to say the least hmm
Update: found some more potential evidence that they are not welcoming nazis, but i think there are quite a few misinformation and “the usual” shitpost things on there that are not very … enjoyable (and of course as the op implies, transphobic trash and such as to expect from a shitpost instance).
- fiah ( @fiah@discuss.tchncs.de ) English9•1 year ago
casually scrolling through their local top posts tells me they pass the duck test on being toxic pieces of shit, so I say let them fester in it by themselves
- erAck ( @erAck@discuss.tchncs.de ) English8•1 year ago
There is the Lemmy.world Admin Response to Defederation from Exploding Heads with some pointers.
- Milan ( @milan@discuss.tchncs.de ) English3•1 year ago
thanks
- OptimusPrimeDownfall ( @OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English5•1 year ago
I will be ok with whatever you choose, whether that is staying federated, starting a conversation with their admins and withholding judgement until after that, defederating, or something else.
Personally, I’m not a fan of those things you have found (transphobia, misinfo, etc.), but I understand that people like that exist. I at least can block them and the communities that spout that trash.
It’s your instance, your hardware, and I trust your judgement.
No
- FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 20•1 year ago
Thanks to federation this post is visible on a wide variety of instances. Which specific instance are you petitioning to defederate from exploding heads? You’re from discuss.tchncs.de so I assume that one?
- MadMaurice ( @madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de ) 27•1 year ago
The community they posted this in should be hint enough…
- FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
It’s a hint, sure. I’m suggesting they should have been explicit rather than relying on hints. People can miss hints.
- MadMaurice ( @madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de ) 4•1 year ago
I called it a hint, but it’s rather obvious, in-your-face information. When you open a post it shows you the Community in at least 3 different spots. It’s nobody else’s fault that that’s not enough for you.
- FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
You’re making the same not-necessarily-true assumption that OP is making.
In Kbin, which I am using to view this instead of Lemmy, it shows it in two places that are both well disconnected from the content of the post itself. There are a bunch of different 3rd party apps being developed for both Kbin and Lemmy right now with various UIs, I haven’t viewed this in any of them yet. I also haven’t viewed it in Mastodon, which I’m told can be used to view Lemmy and Kbin threads. There are innumerable different possible UIs out there in the Fediverse.
And even then, it’s still possible in this case for OP to have been discussing petitioning everyone to defederate from exploding-heads. That’s a reasonable alternate interpretation and I can’t read OP’s mind, only what they wrote.
What I’m suggesting is that we should keep in mind that the only thing that people are guaranteed to see about a post is the actual post, there’s no way of knowing what the surrounding context is going to be. The place you’re posting it is not the only place it will be seen.
- MadMaurice ( @madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de ) 3•1 year ago
Not OP’s fault either if the part of the Fediverse you’re in doesn’t even display the community.
- dancedancedance ( @dancedancedance@beehaw.org ) 6•1 year ago
Probably any instance with common decency/desire to be good people.
- The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) 5•1 year ago
The post is to the !tchncs@discuss.tchncs.de community, which is for discussing discuss.tchncs.de
- FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
It appeared on kbin.social’s “all” feed.
Perhaps it would be a good feature to be able to flag a community as “local only” to prevent it from federating at all, for this kind of thing.
- InFerNo ( @InFerNo@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
If they are calling for a defederation they surely wouldn’t mind if their call carried to other instances to follow suit, not just their own
- randomperson ( @randomperson@kbin.social ) 17•1 year ago
I am against defederations being decided by instance admins. Lemmy needs (kbin being more mature project at least has domain blocking) tools to let users decide themselves what they want or don’t want to see. Are you an adult or you need others to decide for you? I have blocked lemmygrad and other tankie/nazi (same shit) instances (domains) myself. If I don’t want to see eg. transgender stuff then I don’t cry about it but just block it. Grow a pair and do the same.
- sudo ( @sudo@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 7•1 year ago
While I disagree with your opinion on admins, I appreciate the sentiment. But if you want to be on an instance that isn’t defederated or view any content, run you own instance.
That said, the ability for users to moderate the content they see on their own profile could definitely use more flexibility. The ability to block communities as a user is good, but they should absolutely also be able to block instances on their own. Beyond that, the ability to filter out content based on keywords (title, content, urls) would also be a nice addition.
Coming from RiF on Android, the app had filtering and let me say, being able to block Elon, Kanye, Meta, TikTok, a bunch of shit spewing fascists, etc made my Reddit viewing experience much better. This was, of course, after already leaving all of the default subs and finding niche communities but for some reason people had a hard-on for those topics and I could literally not care any less about them.
- hi65435 ( @hi65435@discuss.tchncs.de ) English3•1 year ago
I have blocked lemmygrad
so did I
and other tankie/nazi (same shit) instances (domains) myself.
didn’t see that yet but at least some user with a name in that direction.
Anyway, I found it quite not amusing to see this stuff on my second day of using Lemmy - which was 2 weeks ago or so. Honestly, I’ve seen enough online communities degenerate and having a few power users/enthusiasts who like fine tuning every setting is not enough to get a healthy community going.
I think if Lemmy doesn’t get it’s shit together in that regard, it’ll be like Mastodon where there are alt-right communities powered by it and then another normal (or whatever you want to call it?) part. However I’ve been quite surprised when my first subscriber was some alt-right dude. That was enough for me to delete my account.
At the moment I see chances 50/50 that Lemmy can make it. But this highly depends on:
- making it convenient for non-technical people (discoverability across instances)
- have a reasonable filtering system (if it’s fully democratic and it works that would be awesome. but to be realistic, that would be a first…)
- Gex ( @Gex@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
How can I block an instance?
- randomperson ( @randomperson@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
On Lemmy you can’t. Feel invited to kbin.
- Gex ( @Gex@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
Thanks for the invitation I might actually go there. There is way too much porn on lemmy.
- Milan ( @milan@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
dont worry, it will eventually arrive on kbin as well^^ lemmy is under heavy development. such features will become a thing someday, i am sure. :)
- DigitalBits ( @DigitalBits@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
AFAIK you can’t collapse comments on kbin, which is the main reason I stuck with a lemmy instance.
- Froyn ( @Froyn@kbin.social ) 14•1 year ago
It would be unfair for me to take place in the vote (Hi from Kbin.social).
Here’s the current list of the instances (currently 92) that have defederated(block) EH.- aegisgfx877 ( @aegisgfx877@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
hahaha I suspected as much, when will these dbags learn??
- ProfessorFlaw ( @ProfessorFlaw@kbin.social ) 14•1 year ago
Yes, defederate
- JshKlsn ( @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml ) English12•1 year ago
Lmao, their rules:
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No threats or personal insults
- No discrimination
and yet almost every single comment I read is calling everyone pussies, toxic, and racist words.
Whats the point in having those rules when literally NO ONE is following or enforcing them? Damn.
- Thoralf Will ( @thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de ) English12•1 year ago
Looks like this is really a right wing/fake/hate news instance. No love is lost defederating them.
So: Yes, please!
- hendrik ( @hendrik@lemmy.ml ) English12•1 year ago
Why vote? Isn’t that the decision for the instance admins to make? (And also their job?)
Just ping them and also flag offending posts.
So the admins can make a better decision by knowing what their community thinks.
- hendrik ( @hendrik@lemmy.ml ) English5•1 year ago
Just directly write them a message. I don’t think it needs a vote by the majority of the community to exclude some right wing crypto bros who like transphobia etc
Also if you focus your energy here instead of notifying an admin, they might not read it and you kinda did the opposite of what you intended. Focus your energy here only if the admins and moderation don’t do their job properly.
- maporita ( @maporita@lemmy.ml ) English11•1 year ago
No. Let people make up their own minds … like adults. This is not 5th grade so don’t treat us like it is.
- elevenant ( @elevenant@discuss.tchncs.de ) English10•1 year ago
Having a discussion to form an opinion in the community is a very democratic and adult thing. This helps everyone to make up their own mind and share their opinion. In the end I believe it is very important to defederate instances that cater to conspiracy theories and spread misinformation. The reach of such content in the fediverse must be limited and it is a statement by the community that forms culture.
Thrn you don’t think it’s important to have a discussion. You can’t think that and also be pro censoring discussionns and ideas. You can’t have it both ways
- EremesZorn ( @EremesZorn@beehaw.org ) English3•1 year ago
I would totally agree with you if the general populace weren’t as easily influenced by misinformation and indoctrination as, in fact, 5th graders.
Like, there’s really nothing for anyone to make up their minds about. Don’t give these people a home here; they don’t need to reach the rest of us.