Alt text: three panels with “fossil fuel vehicles” (full of traffic),“electric vehicles” (full of traffic), “walking biking & public transit” (peaceful city with people riding bikes and trams)

    • kimpilled ( kimpilled@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 years ago

      Those things are still available, they’re just not the only option to the detriment of everyone else. Most people and things should be entering the city by rail, which removes the need for city destroying highways that are ever widening.

    • Swedneck ( Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      well the first part is just plain false and the second is marginal: you can deliver things in cities by e-bike and very small electric trucks, and people on the countryside are first off like 20% of the population in almost every country but can also be served by public transport in 90% of cases.

  • Franzia ( Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I really want cycling highways though. Like bike lanes are for commuting. Where’s the lane for having fun? For cyclists, scooters, etc. 😔 this is still an unbelievably urban environment, too, and more integration of the natural environment would also be fucking nice.