You must log in or register to comment.
- jadero ( @jadero@lemmy.ca ) 23•1 year ago
Seems straightforward to me. It’s pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It’s also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.
- TheMcG ( @TheMcG@lemmy.ca ) 15•1 year ago
Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.
I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.
- MapleEngineer ( @MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca ) English9•1 year ago
But your honour it would be devastating to our case!
- baconisaveg ( @baconisaveg@lemmy.ca ) 3•1 year ago
I think it would depend on what they’re trying to charge him with.
- m-p{3} ( @mp3@lemmy.ca ) 6•1 year ago
- Papamousse ( @Frederic@beehaw.org ) 4•1 year ago
lock them up!
- corsicanguppy ( @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ) 3•1 year ago
I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.
Okay, I don’t: they should know better.