Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago

Rishi Sunak to ‘double down’ on anti-green policies in king’s speech

www.theguardian.com

external-link
message-square
8
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • uk_politics@feddit.uk
108
external-link

Rishi Sunak to ‘double down’ on anti-green policies in king’s speech

www.theguardian.com

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
8
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • uk_politics@feddit.uk
PM will announce a new system for awarding oil and gas exploration licences, and new pro-car legislation, sources say
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • federalreverse-old ( federalreverse@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    And the only rationale is this…?

    in the hope of opening up a clear divide over the green agenda with Labour

    • quicklime ( quicklime@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      He’s trying to make sure his party will lose by an even greater margin?

    • Rambi ( Rambi@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      It is basically guaranteed that he has lost the next election so he is just frantically throwing everything at the wall to see if anything sticks

  • interolivary ( interolivary@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s fairly clear at this point that conservatism and conservatives are an existential threat.

    It’s unfortunate that right-wing parties will likely get more and more popular the worse things get as people tend to flock to populists in times of crisis, and I don’t know about other countries but here in Finland the under-25’s are actually more conservative than eg. millennials or gen X – in this year’s parliamentary elections ~30% of them voted for either an extremist right wing party that has a nontrivial amount of literal neo-Nazis in it, or the “fiscally conservative” party which isn’t much better (and has a bit of a revolving door with the extremists).

  • gandalf_der_12te ( gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    At this point I consider any of these “policies” to be a form of suicide.

  • PlasterAnalyst ( PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social ) BannedBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      The Prime Minister holds rather a lot more power

      • PlasterAnalyst ( PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social ) BannedBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Removed by mod

        • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          The Prime Minister is something like speaker of the house plus the non-ceremonial parts of being President rolled up in one.

          • PlasterAnalyst ( PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social ) BannedBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Removed by mod

            • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              It’s larger than most US states in terms of area, and bigger than California in terms of population, with a similarly-sized economy. That’s big enough to still matter.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 56 users / day
  • 79 users / week
  • 869 users / month
  • 3.4K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.08K subscribers
  • 13.2K Posts
  • 22.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code