- cross-posted to:
- firefox@lemmy.ml
- pnutzh4x0r ( @pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org ) English36•11 months ago
Would to see them publish stable releases via this apt repository as well.
- Oliver Lowe ( @otl@lemmy.sdf.org ) 29•11 months ago
Looks like that will happen later. From Mozilla’s original article:
Following a period of testing, these packages will become available on the beta, esr, and release branches of Firefox.
- pnutzh4x0r ( @pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org ) English12•11 months ago
I read that, but I don’t know if that means they will publish stable releases via the same repository. That just sounds like the packages themselves will end up being in those channels (which makes sense, nightly becomes beta, which becomes a release, which ends up as esr). It doesn’t necessarily mean this apt repository will be a release channel itself.
That said, there is the Mozilla Team PPA.
- Oliver Lowe ( @otl@lemmy.sdf.org ) 2•11 months ago
Ah yes good point. Fingers crossed.
- makingStuffForFun ( @makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml ) 1•11 months ago
Brilliant
- Oliver Lowe ( @otl@lemmy.sdf.org ) 16•11 months ago
Good to see development effort going towards actual Firefox and not those random Mozilla products that I can’t keep track of
- dan ( @dan@upvote.au ) 20•11 months ago
Do you mean products like their VPN? They really need the revenue to try and become more independent from Google. Right now something like 90% of their income comes from a deal with Google to make Google the default search engine.
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 3•11 months ago
They should make a search engine. If Kagi can do it, why can’t Mozilla? Because it would upset Google…
There is no real competition. Google has mozilla in a strangehold and they are fine for mozilla to do privacy stuff, but not fine with them competing for real.
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 11•11 months ago
Good :)
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 6•11 months ago
After the disaster with colorways, mozilla has picked up the pace and started being sane again.
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 3•11 months ago
Sorry for commenting on my own post, won’t happen again.
:)
- Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English8•11 months ago
You don’t even build from source?
What kind of Linux users are you?
- Kogasa ( @kogasa@programming.dev ) 8•11 months ago
Never built Firefox from source but Chromium takes way longer than the kernel for me. Like half an hour on a 5800x3D. Bit much for nightly updates.
- katy ✨ ( @cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 8•11 months ago
kinda wish they would put nightly on fdroid too instead of just google play or through the website
- twei ( @twei@feddit.de ) 2•11 months ago
Doesn’t Firefox use GCM? I think fdroid doesn’t allow apps that use that
This is the best summary I could come up with:
While Mozilla has always produced Firefox Nightly builds for Linux as traditional binaries, they have finally decided to offer up an APT repository of Firefox Nightly builds to make it easy to stay up-to-date with new Firefox Nightly releases on Debian and Ubuntu Linux based distributions.
Mozilla announced today they have setup an APT repository as an easy option for using Firefox Nightly on Ubuntu/Debian-based platforms.
The Firefox Nightly Debian packages will also see better performance thanks to extra compiler optimizations, additional security hardening with extra security-related compiler flags, and easily stay up-to-date now via the APT package management.
Eventually the packages will become available for Beta, ESR, and release branches of Firefox from this APT repository too.
More details on this long overdue Firefox APT repository via Mozilla.org.
The original article contains 129 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
- Forcen ( @Forcen@lemmy.one ) English5•11 months ago
Some day they will offer linux version that you can download from from the website and install without using terminal.
- dino ( @dino@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•11 months ago
Appimage? So we go behave like windows users?
- samc ( @samc@feddit.uk ) English1•11 months ago
Whilst I agree that that’s a nice option to have (more options are usually better!) I’ve come to love the linux way of distribution via repositories. These days I barely use the cli too: GNOME software and KDE’s Discover are great. Perhaps an official nightly flatpak would be best?
- hottari ( @hottari@lemmy.ml ) 2•11 months ago
Deb monoculture is a sick plague
- pbjamm ( @pbjamm@beehaw.org ) English3•11 months ago
WAT?
I can not make sense of this comment at all. Can you explain what it is you mean?
- swellow the sun ( @SwellowTheSun@mander.xyz ) 8•11 months ago
He’s complaining that only Debian packages were released, which are compatible with most of popular distros.
- hottari ( @hottari@lemmy.ml ) 1•11 months ago
Ask ChatGPT
- sebsch ( @sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•11 months ago
I am sure there will be a aur package soon bundling this deb into a arch package. So nothing to worry about (for the good package managers)
- hottari ( @hottari@lemmy.ml ) 1•11 months ago
Hehehe. What about RPM users? This fragmentation in Linux packaging robs users of choice.
Would rather have Firefox setup a repository for the nightly channel, after all they official maintain the stable channel on Flathub.
That way everyone benefits from the utility.
- dino ( @dino@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•11 months ago
So how many debian packages with firefox are now available? debian sid, stable, testing & firefox nightly?