myxi ( @myxi@feddit.nl ) 12•2 years agoManjaro Linux is Arch Linux based. Manjaro and Arch relation is like Ubuntu and Debian relation.
Manjaro has its own set of issues that you may want to stay away from.
Edit: Ignore this comment, the image was loaded late. I thought it was a genuine question.
pixxel ( @pixxel@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•2 years agoThanks for linking this, I had totally missed the problems with manjaro.
s4if ( @s4if@lemmy.my.id ) 6•2 years agoBtw I use EndeavourOS xD
Hexarei ( @Hexarei@programming.dev ) 5•2 years agoBtw I use Nix
MaliciousKebab ( @MaliciousKebab@beehaw.org ) 1•2 years agoMy next installation will definitely be NixOS. It’s the new I use Arch btw material IMO.
Mereo ( @Mereo@lemmy.ca ) 3•2 years agoMeh. I’ve been using Manjaro for two years now. So far so good. System has been working perfectly.
Shareni ( @Shareni@programming.dev ) 5•2 years agoCongrats? But that doesn’t change the fact it’s shit.
Manjaro is without a doubt the worst arch derivative by far. Their whole marketing pitch is: “You heard that the arch repo has the most packages, and that they’re all fresh from the pipeline? Use manjaro, and replace it with a smaller one that delays updates by two weeks for absolutely no reason! You want to use arch because of AUR? Oh, the package failed to install because your system is weeks out of date? Tough shit, we’re not supporting AUR…”
It had a value in the time before archinstall, Endeavour, Arco, and Garuda. Each of them either only install arch with sane defaults, or provide some other benefits. Manjaro does neither, unless you count delaying security patches a benefit.
Sneeze7713 ( @Sneeze7713@discuss.tchncs.de ) 3•2 years agoi was hopeful for manjaro. bad management for sure
entropicdrift ( @entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org ) 1•2 years agoI use Mint, Arch (technically Asahi), Debian, Ubuntu, and I used to use Manjaro.
They all have their places. Mint has the best UI/stable no-fuss desktop experience, for instance.
KindaABigDyl ( @KindaABigDyl@programming.dev ) 3•2 years agoArch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team
EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
Shareni ( @Shareni@programming.dev ) 3•2 years agoDon’t forget that it’s repo has less packages and that they’re delayed by two weeks for absolutely no reason. Not only opening users to potential hacks, but also messing up AUR package installation.
Manjaro is Arch’s glue eating cousin
entropicdrift ( @entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org ) 3•2 years agoArch … [is] just a more buggy Arch
I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
KindaABigDyl ( @KindaABigDyl@programming.dev ) 3•2 years agoOops lol
Leaving in
atomic ( @atomic@programming.dev ) 1•2 years agofor me, Debian -> Ubuntu -> Arch -> Artix -> Void -> Gentoo. I’ll reach my final form when I finally run LFS.
Titou ( @Titou@feddit.de ) 1•2 years agoOne of if not the worst Linux distros opinio i’ve ever seen.
20gramsWrench ( @20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•2 years agobtw I use garuda, because I’m a real gaymer