• Looks like they also have communities for phone brands (e.g. Samsung). Not sure if that’s enough value added to necessitate a whole instance for android but I think it is a pretty interesting way to go about it.

      •  fisk   ( @fisk@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I actually disagree with you, insofar as the network effect is limited through community fragmentation. This is, IMO, the biggest flaw in the fediverse for reddit escapees. I don’t have time to participate in 5 different communities, I have time to participate in one, and for there to be a critical mass of users providing constant content, the centralization is critical.

        Now, if I could start making meta-magazines for myself… or better, creating meta-magazines which could then be shared via invite link, allowing for updates over time…

        You know, like a package manager. That’s what I want. A package manager for Lemmy communities.

        edit: Made this into a new post.

        •  esaru   ( @esaru@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I hear you, but you can’t have the positive effects of decentralization and want everyone on one platform. Also consider that a community of a few thousand members for a specific topic should be big enough for fruitful discussions, so a group of 1 Mio can easily split to a few sub groups without negative effects.

          •  fisk   ( @fisk@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I think you’re not entirely understanding what I’m saying - which is definitely not requiring everyone to be on the same platform.

            Instead, what I’m suggesting is to give users control over meta-communities, just as admins have control over instances, and mods have control over communities. This would require that meta-communities could be built by individual users, ideally in a way that they could be shared (but still individually managed) much like a Spotify playlist or GitHub. Users could build their own meta-communities, or “subscribe” to meta-communities curated and shared by others. Additional QoL improvements would be the ability to check a meta-community to determine if a specific user could access/engage with that community, hence the package manager thing.

            In this kind of framework, the broader Fediverse resists echo chambers and fosters diversity by allowing for the creation of instanced communities, while allowing users to determine how posts from those communities are organized and displayed.

            If the Fediverse is taking a stance on the number of instanced communities that an individual should be able to read or participate in, why not make that explicit rather than creating these knee-high barriers?

  •  ijeff   ( @ijeff@lemdro.id ) 
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the warm welcome, folks! I think our content philosophy aligns well with beehaw.org and our hope is that lemdro.id will support the overall health of the Fediverse by contributing to decentralization and supporting active moderation.

  • Copying my other comment here:

    Looks like they also have communities for phone brands (e.g. Samsung). Not sure if that’s enough value added to necessitate a whole instance for android but I think it is a pretty interesting way to go about it. I could totally see app communities popping up over there as well.

  • I’m having difficulty subscribing. It just says Pending. I’ve read this has something to do with the server not responding? I’m not too sure, it’s been like this for many days now, even trying again it stays Pending.