- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
- hackernews@derp.foo
Holzkohlen ( @Holzkohlen@feddit.de ) English180•1 year agoDo you have a minute to talk about our lord and savior Mozilla Firefox?
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) English15•1 year agoActually, yes. Firefox is good but I hate the UI. Okay, Brave seems nice. Love the UI, sync feels slow, and why can I not move the top bar to the bottom on mobile??? Phones are BIG. Don’t make it harder for me to use your product. Okay, there is Vivaldi, king of customisability. Nice, but feels slow. Back to Firefox. Still hate UI. And now wanting a better new tab page. Proceed to discover Tabliss for a good new tab page, and Firefox-UI-Fix on github to give me a better UI on Firefox desktop. Wow, problems solved. I’m sticking to Firefox forever (unless I decide to switch to Librewolf where I can still implement all the same fixes as on Firefox).
ILikeBoobies ( @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ) English16•1 year agoFirefox UI is controlled by CSS
Just find a UI you like and add it in
Flaky ( @Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English7•1 year agoFloorp is Firefox with Vivaldi-style tweaks. Part of it is what Firefox really should be right now.
If you’re a minimalist, I can vouch for Pulse Browser, with sidebar tabs (native to Pulse, similar to Edge) and Simple Tab Groups, it’s great.
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) English2•1 year agoOkay, I will check out Floorp. That project seems really interesting.
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English10•1 year agoNope. Many Chromium forks already have very good inbuilt adblockers , which won’t be affected by the MV3 stuff. On top of that, one could also use system-wide blockers such as AdGuard and DNS-level blockers (which is not even a bad idea if you’re on Windows anyway).
body_by_make ( @Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English70•1 year agoYou can continue to cope or you can upgrade to a real browser.
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English5•1 year agoI already upgraded to Brave years ago. Thanks. And fuck Mozilla.
wagesj45 ( @wagesj45@kbin.social ) 44•1 year agoYou mean Chromium Brave Edition?
DrQuint ( @DrQuint@lemm.ee ) English33•1 year agoMan’s 3 poignant inquiries away from peddling Brave. Tread carefully folks.
WDX ( @wdx@feddit.de ) English13•1 year agoLmao you were right
pimento64 ( @pimento64@sopuli.xyz ) English5•1 year agoBravecels are all the same, maybe they get two extra shitcoins every time they shill for it.
DigitalBits ( @DigitalBits@programming.dev ) English28•1 year agoSystem wide ad blockers can’t block a lot of ads, namely same-domain ads or those that are built into the html. Much rarer than the external page kind (DNS ones) thankfully.
jherazob ( @jherazob@beehaw.org ) English7•1 year agoNamely, Youtube ads
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English4•1 year agoAFAIK, AdGuard can block same domain ads. I’m not talking about AdGuard DNS, I’m talking about AdGuard app/program.
WallEx ( @WallEx@feddit.de ) English19•1 year agoYeah surel, I’ll use the inadequate browser but fox the problems with system wide ad blockers, instead of just using a browser, that doesn’t steal my data and let’s me install addons that I want. Google is way out of bounds here imho.
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English2•1 year agoUse whatever suits you. I’m just saying that people already using browsers with a built-in AdBlock aren’t going to switch, because they won’t even notice the MV3 stuff.
WallEx ( @WallEx@feddit.de ) English10•1 year agoAren’t all those ad blockers and distribution platforms too? Heard about ABP that sell ad space for example.
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English1•1 year agoIIRC, ABP used to whiteliste some “acceptable” ads (non invasive, etc…). Frankly, it’s been literally ages since I have used it, so I don’t know how they behave right now. I was referring to AdGuard as a system-wide adblocker, though, which is a completely different story.
WallEx ( @WallEx@feddit.de ) English2•1 year agoRight, thanks for the clarification.
agame ( @agame@lemm.ee ) English3•1 year agoFor how long?
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English2•1 year agoAs long as these browsers themselves exist. Inbuilt adblockers aren’t extension, are integral parts of the browsers, and don’t need to follow extensions’ rules.
Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) English1•1 year agoLOl @downvotes from delusional and desperate Mozilla’s shills
Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English4•1 year agoMoved to Firefox a while ago, specifically because of Manifest V3.
The only issue I’ve found so far is that you can’t log in to PSN on it. Just locks the browser completely and you need to kill it in task manager. Apparently it’s to do with password saving.
pewgar_seemsimandroid ( @pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English1•1 year agoget brave exclusively for psn?
astromd ( @astromd@beehaw.org ) English1•1 year agoI’ll consider Firefox when they have extension support on iOS, like Orion does.
Blisterexe ( @Blisterexe@lemmy.zip ) English30•1 year agoSee, the fact they don’t is apples fault, their play store guidelines make it impossible for Firefox to add extensions
astromd ( @astromd@beehaw.org ) English2•1 year agoNope. Orion does this today.
ILikeBoobies ( @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ) English15•1 year agoApp Store requires all web access be rendered in safari
Any browser you get on IOS is Safari and so you are right that they could have extensions but it would be impossible for their old extensions to match up/everything has to be rewritten
Blisterexe ( @Blisterexe@lemmy.zip ) English3•1 year agoCouldn’t have said it better myself, thank you
Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English6•1 year agoGood luck with that. All browsing on iOS is Safari, so likely all the FF extensions would need to be remade from scratch.
ColdWater ( @ColdWater@lemmy.ca ) English5•1 year agoThat’s Apple’s fault for not allowing other browser engine
Jeena ( @jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) English51•1 year agoI really wonder if this will make any people move from Chrome to Firefox at all because they can’t use their adblockers anymore. There are probably so few people that most of them already are on Firefox I guess.
hyorvenn ( @hyorvenn@jlai.lu ) English44•1 year agoNope, then they will continue to whine about YouTube and Twitch spamming ads even though the solution already exists.
HouseWolf ( @HouseWolf@lemm.ee ) English11•1 year agoThis ^ some people are weirdly hellbent against using Firefox for basically no reason.
Had a someone I know recently which between 3 different chromium browsers to find one where the adBlock still worked on Youtube, But would refuse Firefox for the pettiest of reasons from ‘I can’t sync logins with my google account’ to ‘That browsers for NERDS’
Flaky ( @Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English7•1 year agotbf, and I’m saying this as a Firefox user, some of the comments about Firefox here make me wanna just
The loudest parts of the userbase can change the perceptions of software to outsiders, very much like fandoms.
pewgar_seemsimandroid ( @pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English1•1 year agojust use a uno reverse card on anyone who say firefox is for nerds
tell them if chrome didn’t exist they would be calling edge and opera users nerds
CALIGVLA ( @Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 13•1 year agoI for one can say I’m very on the fence whether I make the jump or not, because on the one hand I don’t want to deal with MV3, but on the other hand Vivaldi is absolutely unique and Firefox doesn’t even come close to replacing it in terms of features for me.
reflex ( @reflex@kbin.social ) 10•1 year agoAs a fellow Vivaldi user, you know what’ll really make you sad?
There was a plugin that offered practically-identical tiling functionality in Firefox (i.e., tab tiling within one window).
It still exists, but was broken when Firefox moved to manifest. Now it tries to replicate the behavior with individual windows instead, which feels awful to use.
There’s a Firefox fork called Floorp that purportedly has Vivaldi-like tiling, but after a week with it, I couldn’t figure out how to enable it. Plus, it’s in its early stages and some of the users are vocally anti-Vivaldi (more specifically, anti-Floorp-becoming-Vivaldi-on-Firefox) so who knows—all those features might get stripped off down the line anyway.
CALIGVLA ( @Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•1 year agoYeah I tried Floorp awhile ago and it looked interesting, but very early development and jank as hell. It might be something to keep an eye on as long as they keep adding more stuff to it…
vpz ( @vpz@infosec.pub ) English6•1 year agoWhat Vivaldi features do you feel are game changing? I’m not that familiar with it and would love to hear from someone who uses Vivaldi.
Wistful ( @Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de ) English12•1 year agoI’m not the OP, but Vivaldi has been my main browser for many years now.
The reason why some people like Vivaldi is the same reason why other people dislike it. It has a lot of additional features and customization options that other browsers don’t. You may find that cool (e.g., people who used old Opera), or you may dislike it, because “I just want a browser to open web pages.”But anyways…here are some features that I really like and I miss in other browsers:
- Highly customizable shortcuts, gestures and command chains (macros) I use mouse gestures a lot, and on Firefox I had to install an extension to get that feature. Also one tiny feature that I love in Vivaldi, that I really miss in other browsers is to switch tabs by scrolling mousewheel while the cursor is over the tab bar.
- Easy way to add custom search engines (I assume other browsers have this too, but I know that on Firefox it’s a little bit longer process to make one)
- Many ways to organize tabs (stacking, grouping, renaming tab groups…)
- Tab tiling (arranging opened webpages in a single window, good for comparing stuff or multitasking)
- Mail client and RSS feed reader (not very polished but it’s still convenient)
- Workspaces (good for separating tabs, e.g., work, shopping, entertainment…)
- Simple markdown notes (you can access them quickly from a side panel, and u can quickly add selected text from a webpage by right clicking the text and add to note)
- Customizable menus (e.g., customizing options that are presented in the right click context menu)
- Quick commands (it’s like a command palette from which you can search history, bookmarks, run commands, do simple calculations, etc.) you could in theory make your browser UI-less and just use the Quick commands.
Those are just some of my favorites but there is a lot more…And almost all of these additional features you can disable selectively if you wish to do so.
Kissaki ( @Kissaki@feddit.de ) English3•1 year agoEasy way to add custom search engines (I assume other browsers have this too, but I know that on Firefox it’s a little bit longer process to make one)
The reasonable alternative in Firefox is search bookmarks. Create a bookmark with search url target and
%s
placeholder, and give it a search keyword. Then you can search withkeyword search text
. Flaky ( @Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English2•1 year agoVivaldi-to-Firefox here with a little insight! Firefox addons can have the permission to hide tabs, and there are addons that take good advantage of this. Simple Tab Groups can essentially replicate Vivaldi Workspaces, as well as Sidebery if you want something a bit more on steroids in the form of a sidebar.
While I’ve got you here, I’ve had issues with Vivaldi not being able to block Google search results I don’t want to see. Might’ve been me not setting my blocklist up properly, but it works on Firefox with uBlock Origin and Safari with Adguard.Seems like Vivaldi doesn’t support some of the more advanced filtering that Letsblock.it uses for that - AdGuard works.
CALIGVLA ( @Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 8•1 year agoAside from the completely customizable UI, I’d say tab stacking and tab tiling. Web panels are cool as well, you can have translators, calculators and whatnot in your sidebar for quick access that way. It also has a built-in RSS feed reader which is neat.
Kichae ( @Kichae@lemmy.ca ) English1•1 year agoYes, tab stacking and tiling keep me using Vivaldi at work. They’re great, and I remain super sad that there’s no real equivalent in Firefox.
I still use Firefox on my personal computers, but I silently weep a little bit whenever it would be super useful to stack or tile tabs.
Paradachshund ( @Paradachshund@lemmy.today ) English5•1 year agoI think by market share percentages alone there will be a significant number of people that have no idea ad block is going away, and who knows, some of them may make the switch if they look into it.
9up999 ( @9up999@lemmy.ml ) English3•1 year agoNo because brave and Vivaldi exist. Also there is Adguard app for Android or software for windows (not DNS one) and then browser doesn’t matter.
Scrollone ( @Scrollone@feddit.it ) English7•1 year agoCome on, Brave is owned by an ad company. They’re only acting like the good guys to get some users
pewgar_seemsimandroid ( @pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English2•1 year agobrave is not owned by an ad company Startpage is 🐚
reksas ( @reksas@sopuli.xyz ) English3•1 year agoI already moved to firefox, this made me think about stop using google drive and gmail too.
Technically I would be fucked if google decided to just block my account and they have demonstrated they will do it if they feel like it
(the case in 2022 about someone sending picture of their own baby to the doctor and was automatically flagged for it. google blocked that persons account and didnt unblock it even though it was proven he did nothing wrong. The pictures werent even sent via gmail, i think, so google just scanned their private photos.)
I have separate account for youtube, but I worry in the future they might connect it to my main account and start threatening to ban it if i continue using adblock. Now i’m also kind of worried if google decides in the future that something is unacceptable, like making comments against corporations or something.