Like the title says, I’m new to self hosting world. 😀 while I was researching, I found out that many people dissuaded me to self host email server. Just too complicated and hard to manage. What other services that you think we should just go use the currently available providers in the market and why? 🙂thank you

    • KN4MKB ( KN4MKB@alien.top ) B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Meh, been doing it for 5 years now with minimal issues. Had one issue come up where my domain was flagged as malicious, but was solved in a few days and some emails to security vendors.

      I think it’s important that those who can, and are educated enough to keep it running properly do host their own. Hosting your own email should be encouraged if capable because it helps reduce the monopoly, and keep a little bit of power for those who want to retain email privacy.

      • rad2018 ( rad2018@alien.top ) B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I agree with KN4MKB. I’ve been hosting my own mail server for decades. Not one issue. I use that in lieu of a mail service provider (Google immediately comes to mind), as their EULA service agreement will tell you that - since you’re using their service, on their servers - anything goes. Read the fine print on Gmail, and you’ll see. 😉

  • In my opinion, cloud storage for (zero knowledge) backup. Your backup strategy should include a diversity of physical locations. I had a house fire a few years ago. Luckily, my data drives survived, but if they hadn’t, my cloud backup would’ve been invaluable.

  • GolemancerVekk ( GolemancerVekk@alien.top ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Don’t self-host email SMTP or public DNS. They’re hard to set up properly, hard to maintain, easy to compromise and end up used in internet attacks.

    Don’t expose anything directly to the internet if you’re not willing to constantly monitor the vulnerability announcements, update to new releases as soon as they come out, monitor the container for intrusions and shenanigans, take the risk that the constant updates will break something etc. If you must expose a service use a VPN (Tailscale is very easy to set up and use.)

    Don’t self-host anything with important data that takes uber-geek skills to maintain and access. Ask yourself, if you were to die suddenly, how screwed would your non-tech-savvy family be, who can’t tell a Linux server from a hot plate? Would they be able to keep functioning (calendar, photos, documents etc.) without constant maintenance? Can they still retrieve their files (docs, pics) with only basic computing skills? Can they migrate somewhere else when the server runs down?

  • Vogete ( Vogete@alien.top ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    A password manager because if anything goes wrong, you’ll be completely screwed.

    What you SHOULD absolutely self host though is a password manager, so you can be in control of your most sensitive data.

    Regarding email, I think everyone should absolutely self host it, but it’s less and less viable in this google/Microsoft duopoly world. But ideally everyone would self host it. The reason why people advise against it really comes down to lack of real competition, and the two tech giants dictating how we violate every RFC possible.

    • pogky_thunder ( pogky_thunder@alien.top ) B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      A password manager because if anything goes wrong, you’ll be completely screwed.

      What you SHOULD absolutely self host though is a password manager, so you can be in control of your most sensitive data.

      Wot?

  • shrugal ( shrugal@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    People saying email, look into using external SMTP servers as relays. Your domain most likely comes with at least one email account with SMTP access. You can use that as a relay to send personal/business emails from your server using the provider’s reputable IP addresses.

  • ShellDude01 ( ShellDude01@alien.top ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Smtp isn’t that bad so long as you ensure you’re not operating an open relay.

    Really bad stuff will happen once exploited and it will take major work on your part to undo ranging from getting removed from block lists like XBL to possibly having to renegotiate your ISP contract if they have to get involved.

  • netvip3r ( netvip3r@alien.top ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If self hosting from home… email servers

    At home, your IP is likely blacklisted and/or your provider has blocked the necessary ports. Not to mention the layers of potential headaches dealing with potential spam block dbs, especially if you don’t own your IP.

    You can of course do custom setups allowing you to skirt these restrictions, but can sometimes be a bit complicated and typically involve non-traditional customizations.

        • Drwankingstein ( Drwankingstein@alien.top ) B
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Docker is horrid for duplication. Unless you use a filesystem with good deduplication, docker can hurt a lot on your storage. and even then it still can just not work often due to due to already deduplicated extent stuff

          • TBT_TBT ( TBT_TBT@alien.top ) B
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            WTF? You obviously don’t understand Docker at all.

            - Docker and Docker images provide the absolute mimimum environment which is necessary to run an application. Containers don’t have reserved resources, so only what is really used is used. A VM has a lot more overhead, as a whole computer plus complete OS are emulated.

            - There is not much to deduplicate because there is no redundant storage going on. Only the bare OS essentials plus the app are stored. There are some base OS containers (e.g. Alpine Linux) which are <10 Mbytes in size.

            - If containers themselves are “big”, you are doing Docker wrong and store data inside of a container and not externally of the container in volumes or the host filesystem. With the next container pull, that data would be lost.

            - no idea what " just not work often due to due to already deduplicated extent stuff" is supposed to mean. That does not even make sense.

            • Drwankingstein ( Drwankingstein@alien.top ) B
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              As someone who is wasting gigabytes upon gigabytes of data on Docker, get out of here with your stupid bullshit.

              docker layers across containers are not duplicated properly if the images arent setup right which is the case for a significant amount of images.

              The entire point of Docker is that way you can easily go and deploy these specific images that aren’t set up right. One cannot just say, "Well, don’t use those images, do something else, and do your own” because that completely defeats the point of Docker.

              I had nearly 80 gigabytes of duplicated garbage. across my home system alone after after setting up things like surveillance, my nas, nitter etc.

              Don’t come here telling me I don’t understand docker when you are the one who has no idea.

  • borg286 ( borg286@alien.top ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Push notifications.

    It is fine hosting a service that gets requests then talks to FCM or the iOS version. But a service that one’s phone stays connected to 24/7 is really hard, and not kill one’s battery.