I’m beautiful and tough like a diamond…or beef jerky in a ball gown.

– Titus Andromedon

  • 178 Posts
  • 380 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2025

help-circle


























  • I genuinely hope that there is no, has been no, and will be no directed personal attacks toward the Piefed devs over this because nobody deserves that kind of crap (especially when they’re building something you use for free), but I completely understand the backlash against this particular anti-feature.

    I’m not even on Piefed, but apparently I do have a horse in this race after all. Assuming I’m both reading the code correctly and that this code also handles incoming-federated votes, then my votes to piefed.social are also silently quota’d.

    So, if I step away for a few days and come back and catch up in bulk (as I’m wont to do), then assuming the quota of 240 votes per day, only 240 posts and or comments originating from piefed.social are allowed to please me that day. Anything beyond that will seem like it upvoted on my end but will apparently be discarded and the OP will never see them.

    If I’m interpreting that wrong, please correct me.

    So apparently now I have to play resource management and track how many things on Piefed I upvote lest something I really want the OP to get credit for go silently ignored.



  • I read through some other links you dropped in another post and, yeah, there’s a good idea in there somewhere but it seems like it would be better handled case-by-case if vote manipulation is suspected.

    I’m also not really buying the “These accounts control what you see” argument, especially given how many people simply browse by “new” where the score doesn’t matter for ranking at all. I don’t say that to suggest an ulterior motive, but simply that the problem seems blown way out of proportion and the solution feels poorly thought out and hamfisted.