Unilluminated? Night?

FYI - “dark side of the moon” refers to the far side of the moon (that never faces Earth). Dark here has the same meaning as in dark energy: “unknown.”

I have no answer to your actual question, but would also be interested.

I always enjoy Mad Elf around Christmas. It’s a dark ale with Belgian yeast, cherries, and honey.

I’ve never tried to brew it, but there are plenty of clone recipes around to use as a starting point.

c/lostfedditors

You’re looking for c/foodporn. Easy mistake.😁

She’s pretty crafty and good with spatial reasoning - it wouldn’t surprise me if she just picked it up.

Good on you - that sounds nearly impossible from my pert

Good to know there are others - thanks

I feel better that I’m not necessarily married to an alien - thanks

She’s not - interesting, though. I guess it still might help a bit for a righty. Thanks for the perspective.

I could be bothered:

https://xkcd.com/1047/

Also the one another poster mentioned

And a much clearer version only needs two more words:

Remains of Antarctic researcher, who worked for Falklands’ Dependency 66 years ago, found in receding glacier

I agree that it was a good article, though. Editors must have to take a class in headline obstruction.

Edit: maybe I’m wrong; there are many better headlines about this story. The one OP found is uniquely bad:

• Remains of British researcher lost in 1959 recovered from Antarctic glacier
• Melting ice reveals remains of Antarctic researcher who vanished 66 years ago
• Body of Antarctic researcher found 66 years after he disappeared exploring glacier
• Remains of U.K. researcher who vanished in 1959 found on Antarctic glacier: “Shocked and amazed”
• Remains of a Lost Antarctic Researcher Are Finally Recovered, 66 Years After He Fell Into a Crevasse
• After 66 Years, Melting Glacier Releases Antarctic Researcher’s Remains
• Lost researcher’s remains found on Antarctic glacier after 66 years
• Remains Of Antarctic Researcher Lost During 1959 Expedition Found After 65 Years

pH is the negative of the (base 10) logarithm of the activity of H⁺: pH = -log₁₀(a_H+)

If you mean “what’s the difference between concentration and activity,” activity is the “effective concentration” of a species. For ideal solutions, activity is equal to concentration. For real solutions, interactions between the components in the solution may cause a species to “act” like it is more or less concentrated.

Dilute solutions at standard conditions are close to ideal: activity is about equal to concentration. But consider a concentrated solution of a salt: the activity will tend to be lower than the concentration because the cations and anions are not completely independent as in an ideal solution, but tend to “shield” each other due to electrostatic forces.

No, hydrogen (gas) doesn’t spontaneously dissociate into H⁺ when dissolved in water because it’s covalently bonded; it remains H₂, just like nitrogen remains N₂ when dissolved in water. Acidity is a measure of the concentration* of H⁺, so dissolving H₂ doesn’t impact the acidity.

*actually the activity

This might have something to do with it:

The first country to have a reactor could “declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States,” the directive states, a sign of the agency’s concern about a joint project China and Russia have launched.

Unexpectedly, it doesn’t seem like this is a primarily technical decision.

That’s what I’m thinking. Community block lists, too; for example, without blocking the All feed has a much higher anime concentration than I need.

What about user-shareable block lists, similar to those used by ad-blockers? For example, there could be a user-maintained, dynamically updating, shared keyword filter for US politics so that the current hot topics are quickly blocked. This would be more scaleable than the devs making new content filters for everyone that has a specific request.

It’s really dark if the Polymarket tweet is real.

Unless I’ve misunderstood, what OP proposed is just increasing the tax rate of the existing system.

A progressive tax doesn’t result in earning less for working harder; it’s only the marginal income that’s taxed at the higher rate. So a worker who goes from making $50,000 to $60,0000 only pays 15% tax on $10,000 and has a net take home increase of $8,500.

That’s a cool project - good luck and update us on how it turns out.

Here in the US, high strength (95%) ethanol is widely available. We would occasionally do shots of it when I was (much) younger.

deleted by creator