

use cargo-scholium to extract and format annotations


use cargo-scholium to extract and format annotations


I wish feature requests won’t be closed silently as completed


Next step is to make it fully native, without any web view


I don’t think cargo-deny alone is enough. And many from Rust ecosystem thinks that if I specified version “1”, it will be enough forever. Many tools nowadays are installed by binstall, so binary will be older and older and won’t receive any updates.


I would still prefer Rust over C++ even in GamrDev.


Deku is a declarative binary parser. deku_string is an extension which currently provides utility wrappers for data vectors and unicode strings, which can be prefixed or fixed length. Additionally library provides support for 7-bit encoded integers from .NET.
For example, I often work with binary structures where strings are either length prefixed (with zero character in a buffer) or in fixed size buffer with a zero-ended sting inside.
There’s multiple examples with custom writer and reader functions, which work, but are less convenient to use.
Any additional ideas for utilities are welcome.


There’s many components which could be split out from this JS engine such as Regex.
I’d love to see how it passes all ECMA tests


You have to provide source to a rust repository. Otherwise, it’s impossible to compile and link Rust safely. There was an article in the topic.
Long story short you can prepare and link a binary library, but you can’t guarantee any type safety or additional optimisations.


Quick analysis of code shows that there’s no suspicious build scripts or imports added, just an additional poorly documented and not tested function.
Documentation is additionally published to a third-party website.
Repository is probably is hidden which is ok.


Why you’ve wrote “dont sign in…” for GitLab? GitLab is safe
I’ve forgot slint. Same as QT
Currently I use WxWidgets and Cocoa for macOS.
The best would probably be pure native UI with static/dynamic library in Rust for logic. Sounds hard, but it’s the best option in my opinion.
My 2 cents is below. Your decision depends on your tasks, preferences and targets.


It’s a good suggestion


It would be more cool with better descriptions and visual examples


Thank you for sharing the source in the first place.
I personally prefer projects/libraries with more permissive licenses than AGPL.
In terms of reinventing wheels… you precisely told why people do that: learning an engine. I’d use it to create an offline version of my favourite card games, but also, how to discover others think during game development. Latter for me is also important if I’d like to understand mindset how to create things more effectively.
About support… it’s actually hard to say what do you want to achieve. Making an app, library, a game by yourself? Sharing achieved results with community? Find others who can enjoy to create a game in a team with less requirements as there’s in companies?
I haven’t use AI at all