Appreciate the archive link.

Clown.

Reposting your own post now from here? Or is the fediverse playing up?

Old news

Thank you for providing an archive link

See my other comment

As a starter: read this Or use your favourite search engine and look for “ebooks on irc”

Shitty title, it is not (yet) a EU position that VPNs need to be restricted. The article refers to a paper from EPRS aimed at (mis) informing EU lawmakers. The paper only says that ‘some’ consider VPNs a loophole that needs closing and states without providing any evidence that VPNs are increasingly used by minors to bypass age restrictions.

Not a fan of Corbyn, or my party, or the Raisin. But this is scary stuff.

I struggle with the logic here. NATO or Europe won’t be involved or distracted if China invades Taiwan. And I doubt Putin is daft enough to start an all out war with Europe. It might be a distraction for the US, but we don’t need the US to wipe the floor with Russia

out of date

Spray it with bleach.

I never said it was a huge majority (although significantly bigger than the majority that got us out in the first place). But your comment suggests that rejoining is unpopular outside London, and I found no evidence for that. Hence my question if you have anything to back up your initial comment.

Got any evidence for that? The majority of people think brexit was a failure and are in favour of rejoining, and within labour (and libdems and greens) it’s an even bigger majority. Source: yougov

Next up: allegations that Mamdani is a member of one of those groups

I’m guessing Japan would also want to avoid that.

Streeting himself is a threat to the future of the NHS

Wasn’t aware of ABC’s inconsistent use of titles, just noticed that clicking on the link gives a title that is a bit more informative than the post title. But since the post title was also provided by ABC as you showed, it’s just unavoidable i suppose.

Shitty post title. Article’s title: Satellite imagery matched to Sudan’s El-Fasher shows the brutality of a massacre

He isn’t even discussing which promises they won’t be able to deliver on and why. Just slinging mud. And stating the next election will be a fight between reform and labour - which, if they keep going the way they are, may not be the case.