How is this different than Fabrice Bellard’s achievement in 2011? https://bellard.org/jslinux/

IPv6 is not affected by this race because the kernel copies the options for IPv6 connections.

It’s been a slow-going effort to get a compile flag into the kernel that disables IPv4, but this is precisely the type of bug which that flag would have avoided. When devices choose to natively use IPv6-only – eg IoT – they really shouldn’t have to also accept an increased attack surface from Legacy IP, something that is increasingly unnecessary.

Disabling IPv4 when it’s unneeded is good security posture, but such a choice is not available yet in Linux.

This does not comport with what OP says below.

What language is this?

This appears to be an AI port of an AI project named after a conspiracy theory?

Is this for wood handling (ie avoiding splinters and sharp edges)? Or for use with rotating machinery? I don’t think the latter is advisable.

It is time for all computing professionals billionaires and corporations to accept responsibility for computing’s humanity’s current state

FTFY

In all seriousness, Vardi correctly identifies the problems with “move fast and break things” and “efficiency at the expense of resilience”. Yet then uses victim-blaming language that “we allowed” mega corporations to exist. Even if the “we” is read as “society at large”, it cannot be reconciled with the call-to-action, which unambiguously targets the individuals of the industry. Without effective organization, no amount of individualized action can overcome a structural problem. It’s unclear to me what his point is.