

About illegal U.S. Command operations in the global south: That does not seem surprising with America’s (and Canada’s) CIA illegal covert war operations of multiple homicides (more than hundreds, plausibly more than thousands per year going on for decades now (2026)) of gunning down and of bombing peasants in lands with concentrations of petroleum and gold and silver (e.g. Mexico, Columbia, and very recently Venezuelan parliament, and Nigerian peasant village). Even a brief surface review of a Netflix show like ‘Narcos’ shows viewers America’s CIA actually have been running south american drug cartels themselves, choosing a new dictator of a corporation bigger than many countries, in batches of approximately 2 years, based on levels of fascist servitude of their discursive positions. In the collusive monopolist tv news, they have been describing their actions using smokescreens of the likes of “The War On Drugs!”, “protecting kids from drugs” (instead of actually funding education about drugs for informed healthy use of healthy drugs), and “spreading democracy” using guns and bombs like poison on a toast. Concurrently, their collusive monopolist corporations have been selling cocaine, opioids and benzodiazepines, in collusive monopolist hospitals of the likes of United Health Care Corp, the likes of which have been killing patients for profit by refusing to honor insurance and hospital care contracts, under an extensively documenting surveillance apparatus of their collusive monopolist corporations of the likes of Google, Facebook, Amazon and Palantir.
What do we recommend then? Progressive taxation campaigns, funding education, paying university-level student work of studies, decomposition of monopolies through application of the actual law (e.g. anti-trust law, armed robbery and homicide law, etc.). Like Margaret Thatcher refused to acknowledge, despite their plans of robbery of collective capital (privatization), there are many alternatives!
Or else what? Piketty (2013) argued that inequalities of the sort that such atrocities have emerged from have historically only come back down to normal levels of inequalities in the aftermath of the French Revolution and World Wars I and II.
References, recommended reading:
Paley, Dawn. 2012. “Drug War Capitalism”. AK Press. Piketty, Thomas. 2013. “Le Capital au 21e siecle.” Editions Seuil. Kropotkin, Pyotr. “The Conquest of Bread” (1892), “Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution” (1902) Teachout, Zephyr. “Break’ em Up (2019)”
Happy reading!
MountainBear49

About “the mentality of the general society” (‘the’ society?, of what?):
OppressedBread@lemmy.ml probably meant the propaganda of a feudalist monopolist network of a very few real addresses near your residence.
About “break out of the norm” (‘the’ norm?, of what?):
OppressedBread@lemmy.ml probably meant: break out of their discursive shackles and traps. In any case where some ‘person’ has the indecency of regurgitation of the sewer content trope “they have something to hide”, an appropriate response should probably look like: “oh, if you don’t have ANYthing to hide, then I would like to review the contents of your bank accounts, credit cards, all of your passwords, all of your work files, etc.”, pursuing after a confused reply with: "so YOU too DO HAVE THINGS TO HIDE, and a short list of serial multiple HOMICIDERS HAVE BILLIONS more THINGS TO HIDE, INCLUDING BODIES, in addresses in cities with names that rhyme with San Francisco, Houston, and Florida, for example, not to mention other rotten illegitimate jurisdictions of the likes of London, Paris, Panama, Moscow, Luxembourg, Beijing, etc.
A sensible norm would have at least incarcerationed those repeat armed robbery and homicide law offenders a long time ago for a long time, with harsh conditions of labor until reintegration at the cheapest level of wage labour. A sensible norm would also have reviewed methods of application of collectively democratically deliberationed norms developed in France circa 1789, for example, where 3% of the population (mostly capital owners and members of clergy) owned more than 90% of national capital, and near 97% of the population had no significant ability to read basic texts.
A SENSIBLE NORM would express DISSATISFACTION ABOUT NOT FIGHTING FEUDALIST MONOPOLISM BACK TO GROUND AND UNDER, decomposing that matter until re-usable in the form of compost for feeding plants for food.