Maybe it’s to keep the existing assets from cratering in value. Storage and RAM prices have gone up in value, if all those assets returned to their sane values then many more loans would be upside down.

I have restricted mode turned on one of my devices because I often use it to watch stuff with my kids:

Huh, this video got flagged as mature content. Unusual move for this channel…

No OTA updates then. I wonder if the dealerships would view that as a positive.

One fix for this is to have the data centers that do the data collection be located in your country and subject to your laws. China would love to cooperate on that front but it wouldn’t protect the profits of certain industries.

Lack of evidence is not evidence for your pet theory.

China made trade groups with their regional rivals, so no, we do not see a similar response. China’s response is rooted in win-win diplomacy that improves the material conditions of all parties involved. It is less a moral calculation and more a material one that creates a moral authority.

Yes and that is a winning strategy. As another ml account highlighted, war with the global north did not end well for the USSR, which comparatively speaking was much more a peer in terms of power than the current Russia. China’s strategy is the one that recognizes that the tactics available flow down stream from material conditions.

Isn’t Brazil part of BRICS? Their strategy isn’t just to avoid war, they are building soft power at a time when the USA is burning goodwill for short term gain (though with Iran the only gains seem to be oil profits).

And yet China manages to take the high road with Taiwan, Japan, India, etc.

Seems like it’s hard to find the actual repository and they put it behind a trigger warninf: https://github.com/terrafying/ai-torture-chamber

Ahh yes, “liberating” a population by bombing them. A policy shared by both NATO and Russia. Both should look at China’s example for an alternative path.

Back in the day heroku did much of this it seemed. But then it got bought by Salesforce of all companies and lost the plot. It was nice, just push to git and your app was deployed, and this was before Docker existed.

I want this as a puzzle for some reason

This sort of stuff does little to create safety but does a lot to hype AI. Here’s an idea: ban unsafe software for cases where safety is a requirement OR hold these companies accountable for illegal outcomes (no more “oops, our software hacked a competitor” without getting hit with a lawsuit). Newsome would never do something so sensible as it would hurt his donors’ bottom line.

I’m sure the AI told them they were right to push back when they confronted it

“Let that AI, when it comes, find us working or teaching, singing, playing with children, calling our elected representative …” Miles said. “Let the AI find you doing well.”

Rich coming from a people who hold contempt for all those things.

Yet we can’t be bothered to address what the author said.

That too is covered in the article FFS

And if they aren’t able to communicate why it’s bad to be a bigot then they lack the skills to protect any of us when it matters.