🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

@blakestacey Which, of course, I didn’t.

Because I don’t use Linux.

But hey, go ahead and continue being wrong. I’m sure you’re used to it by now.

@pikesley @dgerard Wrong on two of two fronts within two words. Amazing performance!

@bitofhope Many people don’t even realize there *are* alternatives.

I use LibreOffice at home and work, and the rest of people at work I think the one they’re using is called WPS Office. (They’re mutually compatible so the fact I use something different doesn’t matter much.)

Yet despite the many (mostly-compatible) options out there, people often don’t know of them. So pointing it out is … nagging?

🤷‍♀️

I guess they’re stuck if they don’t even want to hear about alternatives. C’est la vie.

@dgerard Or don’t use Microsoft products? Just sayin’.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

@juergen_hubert No, I don’t. I’ve only ever seen one German RPG, and that wasn’t it.

@juergen_hubert Well “introduced” if you ignore practically every game made for almost 15 years before it. 🤣 (I know what you mean. I just think it’s funny wording!)

@juergen_hubert I like a good rules *framework* with a small, consistent, easily-extensible set of core mechanisms that can be used for everything else.

If the rules then show how to use it for everything else (like C&S 3.0+) that’s icing on the cake.

What I don’t like is games with incoherent, inconsistent rules for everything that don’t interact well with each other (like AD&D’s entire combat system from surprise through initiative through actual combat, including unarmed combat).