AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.eutech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0x815 ( @0x815@feddit.de ) Technology • 1 year ago message-square36fedilinkarrow-up1198
arrow-up1198external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com 0x815 ( @0x815@feddit.de ) Technology • 1 year ago message-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.eutech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-square Even_Adder ( @Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoNot much changes with this ruling. The whole thing was about trying to give an AI authorship of a work generated solely by a machine and having the copyright go to the owner of the machine through the work-for-hire doctrine.
Not much changes with this ruling. The whole thing was about trying to give an AI authorship of a work generated solely by a machine and having the copyright go to the owner of the machine through the work-for-hire doctrine.