AAAAtomsmander.xyzimage fossilesque ( @fossilesque@mander.xyz ) M Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year ago message-square42fedilinkarrow-up1497
arrow-up1497imageAAAAtomsmander.xyz fossilesque ( @fossilesque@mander.xyz ) M Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year ago message-square42fedilink
minus-square Margot Robbie ( @MargotRobbie@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoI think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
minus-square Jolteon ( @Jolteon@lemmy.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year ago96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
minus-square photonic_sorcerer ( @photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-square ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃 ( @name_NULL111653@pawb.social ) linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…