• Honestly I’m sure this is the best solution. I get that a d4 is the obvious choice for something that should have a 1/4 chance of happening but a d8 with 4 numbers twice would be the most appropriate.

    The only downside I can see is that a d8 and a d8/4 would be easy to mix up at first glance.

      • D8? D20/5 x d20/10

        Am I missing something here? Can this even generate 5 or 7?

        D20/5 gives [1…4] and D20/10 [1…2], of course assuming whole numbers. Where to get the factors for 5? 5 can be factored only as 5x1 or 1x5 and the 5 cannot be found either in d20/5 or d20/10. Same is true for 7.

        And I don’t see it happening either if we allow rational numbers. To get 5 we would get the following expressions
        5= d120/5 x d220/10 = d120 x d220/50
        or 250= d120 x d220
        And two d20 multiplied together cannot give us 250.

        Math baby?

        • You are right, in my mind the d20/2 was some sort of iterator over the d20/5, the correct math would be d20/5+(20/5*(d20/10-1)). To get 5 this expresion would be with a 1-5 in the first one and a 11-20 on the second, the first would be 1 (rounded up) , and the second one 4*(2-1), so 5. The idea is that you use the second one to decide how many batches of the full first batch you add to the first one. As if you were rolling a d100 with two d10 but in base 20/5 instead of base 10. It’s not actually base 20/5 but that’s the idea, one of the dice is the “tens” dice and the other is the “hundreds” dice.

          … math baby