Which one(s) and why?

    • Engywook ( Engywuck@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Dunno, during 8ish years I have only hada couple of minimal problems due to updates (and the solution was promptly available on Arch homepage). Can’t speak for other, though.

    • twei ( twei@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      We’re using Arch 2

      (No it doesn’t, it just has some bugs here and there, e.g. my media keys don’t work after a couple days of uptime (gnome). I stopped actively looking for and reading the release notes years ago as it just works… and if it doesn’t, I still have a btrfs snapshot from before the update)

    • Fubarberry ( Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I tried Manjaro for awhile and had some major system breaks. Manjaro is/was often pitched as newbie-friendly arch, so having it break made me think arch was going to be even worse.

      Been running endeavour for a few years now though, and haven’t had any real issues. Much smoother than my Manjaro experience.