Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Mysteriarch ☀️ ( Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago

To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol

techcrunch.com

external-link
message-square
102
link
fedilink
264
external-link

To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol

techcrunch.com

Mysteriarch ☀️ ( Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
102
link
fedilink
To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
external-link
Meta today is offering more details about how it plans to make its messaging apps, WhatsApp and Messenger, interoperable with third-party messaging
  • 4dpuzzle ( tesseract@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    Last time they touched an open chat protocol, they hung it out to dry. That was XMPP. That’s why more than half of the fediverse is reluctant or outright hostile to federate with anything meta.

    • smileyhead ( smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      maybe they could convince meta to use it

      I think he/she meant convincing Meta to use MLS, not Matrix.

      • 4dpuzzle ( tesseract@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Now that I read it again, you may be right.

    • AMDIsOurLord ( AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • 4dpuzzle ( tesseract@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        You are underplaying the damage Google and FB did to XMPP. It wasn’t supposed to be relegated to an obscure backend protocol. The involvement of those companies ensured that it didn’t become a popular user-facing protocol.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 176 users / day
  • 777 users / week
  • 2.12K users / month
  • 5.18K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.7K subscribers
  • 6.4K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code