A little admiration of how easy UI customization is on Firefox, and how shitty Chromium looks.

  • What I wrote?

    • no container support
    • no stored session = not a browser normal people will switch to
    • not more hardened or privacy optimized than librewolf
    • no profile support too I guess, because private browsing.

    But sorry your statement is correct, it is a privacy focused version of Firefox.

    But not sure what the “use more to separate activities” means, I try to do that with containers and mail aliases and its already complicated. Running and updating 2 browser engines will not help here.

    • Such as using socials on 1, banking on another.

      Also, a browser for your searches. I guess containers could do that but my understanding you still can get finger printed easily plus I could not get to use them consistently. Having different browsers made it easier, at least for me.

      • Containers are persistent and you can also use 2 profiles of the same browser and add a desktop entry to launch them separately.

        Using separate browsers really is no good practice.

        Fingerprintability may be already given by your IP.

        Also the fingerprint defender addons help with randomizing some identifiers and fool naive scripts

          • No that clears browser data, the fingerprint is very complex. If you mean cookies, Librewolf and Firefox can delete all but you can add exceptions where you want to stay logged in. Very handy, also not there in private browsing.

            • For me its way easier to use a different browser for each use case. Librewolf for something, Mullvad for something else, also Brave, also Vivaldi. 4 different browsers are making my life seriously easy. Why would I stick to 1 browser with many profiles? If something breaks in that one browser (which happens quite often) all I have to do is fire up a different one and try again. Different people different use cases, different streamlines.