I’m a fairly new users, but I feel that navigating around the fediverse is a bit cumbersome, maybe the wrong word for it. But there is a lack of overview in a way. I enjoy being on this server, but I also like to follow other communities. Lots of different topics, everything from cars to Linux to architecture.

Right now there are 10 (that I could find on browse.feddit.de) instances named Linux on different server. So the small number of Linux users using some fediverse instance is spread around over many servers. Coming from reddit, things were far from perfect over there, but there is only r/Linux. It’s a shame users are spread so thin all over the place.

I used Linux as an example, I’ve seen the same “problem” for other topics as well. Anyways, just my perspective as a new users. Hope this wasn’t too much of a rant, maybe we can look at this as an issue where the fediverse can improve.

  • Yes, I don’t wont it exactly like reddit. We are over 12k people here on this server so there are plenty of people so talk to to have a general discussion. The small issue is the more niche a hobbie/community is there more of a problem it. Instead of 100 Linux users on one server there is 10 people on 10 servers (just imaginary numbers to get my point across).

    The point is to connect with people with similar interests. If one “sub” does go bad, we can just make a new one on a different instance.

    I do agree that no one wants power-hungry mods ruining a sub.

          • Hopefully that doesn’t happen.

            1. For some topics, there are already existing, very active, communities before the subreddits with the same topic migrated over. Who should merge with whom? The existing large communities with subreddit migrators? Or, the subreddit migrators merging with th existing large communities … and conforming to the rules and culture in those existing large communities?

            2. As mentioned, there are different cultures and rules that develops per community. There is no such thing as one-size-fits-all.

            3. Even if communities “consolidate over time”, it will still split up no matter what. That’s how it has always been sincee the beginning of online communities.

            4. IF communities indeed consolidate over time, if that server/instance goes down, the entire consolidated communities will be gone overnight, and all the content they collected together. We’ve already seen this happen just this year, forget about the previous years.

            In short, don’t expect it. In fact, it should be supported to ensure that:
            a. we don’t return to a centralise system
            b. we don’t put all our eggs in one basket
            c. we build redundancy, continuation, and resiliency.

            _

      • yes it will because it means they each need to monitor 20 linux subs to keep up on all the conversation. Decentralizatin is a good idea, but it is not very user friendly, and it only works well for those who are computer savvy. for the other 90% of internet users, it is extremely complex and confusing.

    • In my experience I find niche community are very well “centralized”, like there is only one gnome community.

      However larger community are speard between servers like tech etc. That really is not a problem for me, as any of these larger community can give me the news I need. Also sub to all 3 of them is not a big deal either.

      Like everyone on reddit sub to at least 3 art communities, 5 dank meme communities, and 10 music communities.