Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? Spoiler: It is not that object-oriented programming is somehow better so programmers prefer it, but rather it's political economy, and, arguably, pure luckinvidious.osi.kr snek_boi ( @snek_boi@lemmy.ml ) General Programming Discussion@lemmy.ml • 2 years ago message-square10fedilinkarrow-up17
arrow-up17external-linkWhy Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? Spoiler: It is not that object-oriented programming is somehow better so programmers prefer it, but rather it's political economy, and, arguably, pure luckinvidious.osi.kr snek_boi ( @snek_boi@lemmy.ml ) General Programming Discussion@lemmy.ml • 2 years ago message-square10fedilink
minus-square hfkldjbuq ( @hfkldjbuq@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink3•2 years agoOOP as is popular known is basically “fancier” imperative programming; Turing > Von Neumann > Imperative > OOP Lisp is basically were we got dynamic type, and Lisp is the earliest influential example of functional programming.
OOP as is popular known is basically “fancier” imperative programming; Turing > Von Neumann > Imperative > OOP
Lisp is basically were we got dynamic type, and Lisp is the earliest influential example of functional programming.