Stressmander.xyzimage fossilesque ( @fossilesque@mander.xyz ) M Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 6 months ago message-square13fedilinkarrow-up1293
arrow-up1293imageStressmander.xyz fossilesque ( @fossilesque@mander.xyz ) M Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 6 months ago message-square13fedilink
minus-square azi ( @azi@mander.xyz ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoHow is it more practical when 1 m/m = 1 mm/mm = 1 μm/μm?
minus-square Umbrias ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoBecause excel doesn’t have built in unit handling so when you enter in readings from the strain gauge you’ll probably enter them in what’s being reported. You can write the units of strain however you like, I often say ul for unitless.
minus-square nooneescapesthelaw ( @nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoThe original specimens and data are usually in mm, not meters so mm/mm makes more sense than m/m, although you do have a point
How is it more practical when 1 m/m = 1 mm/mm = 1 μm/μm?
Because excel doesn’t have built in unit handling so when you enter in readings from the strain gauge you’ll probably enter them in what’s being reported.
You can write the units of strain however you like, I often say ul for unitless.
The original specimens and data are usually in mm, not meters so mm/mm makes more sense than m/m, although you do have a point