•  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) 
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    If they can have no control of the underlying corporation why bother owning it? Why not just put it on the free market then?

    Obviously owning it does give some level of control, boards of directors can have opinions, the principal investors can set directives

    •  NaN   ( @Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because it’s for fundraising, and they maintain very generic vibe setting, and they know Elon Musk won’t buy it.

      The Foundation literally cannot focus on the browser, so what’s your continuing problem here?

      •  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) 
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        That the Mozilla organization as a whole, including the foundation, has lost track of what is actually good for a free and open internet. And it makes me sad

        •  NaN   ( @Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          What is good is not letting unethical corporations and only unethical corporations develop cutting edge technologies because me Firefox user and me not like anything ever change.

          Cat’s out of the bag, nothing ever goes back the way it was, you just get to live in the new world.

          •  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) 
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Agreed the world is forever moving forward. Mozilla is being left behind.

            To close the loop on this whole discussion, the Mozilla foundations executive director hire was posted to a Firefox community, Firefox being owned by the Mozilla corporation. Clearly there is cross concern between these organizations, otherwise the post would not have been made here, you wouldn’t have read it, and you wouldn’t have been able to respond to it.