•  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Revenge porn was there before AI… but somewhat ironically, as more people are likely to label anything from SFX, to game renders, to the lunar landing, as “AI”… even actual recordings of porn used for revenge, are more likely to be dismissed as “just AI”, reducing its impact (no more Kardashians).

    People should still take responsibility for educating their little brats, which has nothing to do with whether it’s AI, gun ownership, or “just” bullying.

      •  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        So, like what kind of legislation? All the problematic uses of AI, already have legislation against them. I don’t see any viable “anti-AI” legislation, just enforce the one already in place. Meanwhile, strengthening prevention and responsibility rules, would benefit all aspects of society, including the uses of AI.

        • Limiting what that data can be trained on for one. No pictures of kids for example. For porn specific AIs, don’t allow users to upload custom images. That is just asking for revenge porn or CSAM. Companies clearly can’t be trusted to put in safeguards for themselves, so I guess it is time for legislation.

          • No pictures of kids for example

            Meaning, an AI blind to kids.

            Keep in mind that training data is required for both recognition, and generation. Legislating that kids “It doesn’t look like anything to me”, leads to things like:

            • Cars that don’t stop for “It doesn’t look like anything to me”
            • Spam filters that don’t stop porn, or gore, or both, of “It doesn’t look like anything to me”
            • Photo storage that erases empty photos which “It doesn’t look like anything to me”

            For porn specific AIs, don’t allow users to upload custom images

            Not sure how you think AIs work, but anyone can train a LoRa on their own laptop, no “uploading” to anywhere required.

            Companies clearly can’t be trusted to put in safeguards for themselves, so I guess it is time for legislation.

            Cool, and I agree with that. I just think that example is horrific (for starters, it would make Lemmy’s anti-CSAM filter illegal, since it’s trained on pictures of kids).

            Got any other proposals?

    • I think it’s funny you talk about revenge porn like it’s just so tiresome and tedious to think about.

      “Oh, a hurricane struck Florida again.”
      “Oh, there’s revenge porn of my neighbor’s daughter again.”
      “What a terrible saturday.”
      “Anyway, I think my toast is done.”