• t3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    $25 BILLION dollars wasted. Imagine how many people that could have helped. Fucking travesty.

    I’m not against private commerce, but these companies sure are working hard to change my mind.

      • t3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not according to the article:

        Per “former employees on the Alexa shopping team” that WSJ spoke with, however, the amount of shopping revenue tied to Alexa is insignificant.

        • corsicanguppy ( corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Does the article say how the Alexa unit has absolutely no access control? Kids ordering dollhouses? Check. The news on TV triggering a response? Daily.

          They can’t expect us to link our visa cards to something that doesn’t even know “this is little Billy” – actually it can discern people – “who should never be able to buy stuff” – which it can’t do.

          The units are bad: no authorization and no auditing. Neighbor tried to order you 200 rakes as he rolled past your garage? You’ll get your f’n rake back, Dennis, just fuck off and don’t bug me every month.

      • I agree. Plus, right now Alexa is somewhat integrated with my life. I’m constantly interacting with Amazon’s ecosystem. Take that away, and it becomes another online retailer (a hugely important one, but nonetheless…) and movie rental service. I could easily step away from Amazon in a way that is more difficult today.

        Multiply that across their customers and is the value 6 billion per year? I don’t know, that’s a lot of money, but it’s not a simple cost analysis.

        • jarfil ( jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Amazon claims to have Alexa on 100 million devices, so $6 billion/year would be $60/user/year.

          It’s not peanuts, but… Amazon Prime has 230 million subscribers worldwide, that is $140/user/year.

          Sounds like one could be financing the other.

    • jarfil ( jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It could’ve helped 0 people… because people with the $25 billion want to say “Alexa, do this”, instead of sitting on their sofas an reveling on how they sent $60/year to help someone they don’t know, out of which 90% went to finance the people helping, not the helped ones.

        • jarfil ( jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          It wasn’t an investment round, Amazon got it from customers. Then, from among the options of:

          • Let customers say “Alexa do this”
          • Give each customer a $60/year discount coupon
          • Spend it on charity
          • Build a 300ft tall golden statue of Jeff Bezos

          …Amazon decided that people would give it even more money, if it did the Alexa thing.