Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 useful_idiot   ( @useful_idiot@lemmy.eatsleepcode.ca )  to Free and Open Source SoftwareEnglish · 3 years ago

RedHat to provide RHEL source code only to paying customers moving forward

www.redhat.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fedora@kbin.social
  • linux@lemmy.ml
43
external-link

RedHat to provide RHEL source code only to paying customers moving forward

www.redhat.com

 useful_idiot   ( @useful_idiot@lemmy.eatsleepcode.ca )  to Free and Open Source SoftwareEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fedora@kbin.social
  • linux@lemmy.ml
Furthering the evolution of CentOS Stream
www.redhat.com
external-link
As the CentOS Stream community grows and the enterprise software world tackles new dynamics, we want to sharpen our focus on CentOS Stream as the backbone of enterprise Linux innovation. We are continuing our investment in and increasing our commitment to CentOS Stream. CentOS Stream will now be the sole repository for public RHEL-related source code releases.
  •  !ozoned@lemmy.world   ( @ozoned@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    Wonder how this affects direct RHEL copies such as Rocky or Alma.

    I was at Red Hat when they moved CentOS to Stream and a lot of us were VERY unhappy about it. Kind of knew the writing was on the wall for them when Red Hat hugged them closer.

    I don’t get this move, other than to fight direct copies of RHEL, such as Rocky or even Oracle. This might push those folks to have to follow CentOS stream, which is NOT RHEL.

    Though I don’t know how the copies do their builds now.

    •  ipha   ( @ipha@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Shouldn’t affect them much, it just means they’ll need a single RHEL subscription.

      •  caron   ( @caron@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        It would count as an unauthorized use of the subscription, so Red Hat wouldn’t keep doing business with them, and wouldn’t receive new binaries.

        •  ipha   ( @ipha@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          That sounds like a giant GPL violation if sources are provided under the condition that you don’t use them.

      •  !ozoned@lemmy.world   ( @ozoned@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Wonder if a dev subscription is enough.

        •  ipha   ( @ipha@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          Legally they must provide source to anyone they provide binaries to.

Free and Open Source Software

foss

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !foss@beehaw.org

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 180 users / week
  • 518 users / month
  • 2.1K users / 6 months
  • 3.43K local subscribers
  • 21K subscribers
  • 1.13K Posts
  • 14.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Gaywallet (they/it)   ( @Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code