Presidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.devimage mozz ( @mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml • edit-21 month ago message-square16fedilinkarrow-up1247
arrow-up1247imagePresidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.dev mozz ( @mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml • edit-21 month ago message-square16fedilink
minus-square rarWars ( @rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilink19•1 month agoThe percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
minus-square FurtiveFugitive ( @FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee ) linkfedilink5•1 month agoJust like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.
minus-square flora_explora ( @flora_explora@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink1•1 month agoAlso, sometimes it say “won” or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?
minus-square mozz ( @mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) OPlinkfedilink3•1 month agoThe asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.
The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.
Also, sometimes it say “won” or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?
The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.