Queensland’s Labor government turned heads last week with a bold new election promise. If returned to power, it would set up 12 state-owned petrol stations and limit fuel price rises to just five cents a litre on any given day.
The proposal certainly tapped into a pain point for Queenslanders – Brisbane topped national petrol price rankings last year.
But it was quickly met with a predictable pile on from opposing political commentators, industry bodies and some economists, attracting labels like “risky” and “dumb and stupid”.
Mark McKenzie, chief executive of the Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association, called it a “wildly bizarre intervention” in the retail fuel market.
So is the Queensland premier really out of his mind, trying to win votes less than three months out from an election? Or is there actually some merit to this proposal?
Name one thing that’s been privatised that has resulted in any combination of better product, better service, or better price?
Your comment couldn’t have been clearer, but 3 out of the 4 replies to it seem to have interpreted it to mean exactly the opposite of what it says.
Either that, or those three comments are incredibly fucking dumb and their idea of “better product” is “more money for corporations”.
Commonwealth Bank:
Telstra:
Wait nevermind
Telecom wasn’t exactly a shining example of a government run service though.
Side note: Bring back the CES , privatised job search is an absolute fucking disaster.
Hospitals.
Better service for very rich ppl. No service or unaffordable for rest.
Better product, and better service. Not better on the price, but it was asked for one out of three.
rapid transit. chicagos el system the various lines were all independently owned but now they are part of one system with free transfers between them and even bus and train.
Water/sewer systems