1. She signed the bill

      2. Her entire speech was to be tough on immigration. And let’s not forget the classic “do not come here”.

      3. She is right wing. Democrats are right wing

      4. She is complicit in genocide.

      5. She put tons of people in jail the didn’t deserve it, just for smoking weed and then laughed when they asked her about it.

      6. She is a staunch supporter of Israel

      The fact that you think that she is left wing is insane.

      • Most of your points have nothing to do with this issue, but ok. Yeah she signed the bill, so did most Democrats, only to have Republicans back out of signing their own bill. One side is working with others and trying to accomplish something beneficial, the other side is crying about a border issue and then tanking any attempts to address it. None of that equates to the false narrative that Harris is flip-flopping on the issue.

        • Signing the bill makes it their bill. The fact that you are defending it and saying “trying to work together” like if it is a good thing. Working together for what to build the wall and kick out expats? You guys are really in a cult

          • So the Republicans created the bill, then made ulterior demands when they saw that Democrats were willing to help secure the border, but now suddenly it’s a Democrat bill because the Republicans didn’t sign their own bill when daddy Trump told them to jump? That’s some mighty interesting hoops you’re jumping through there.

            • secure the border

              You mean putting people that try to come in cages like Biden has done in his entire time in office, even more than Trump. Democrats are way worse in immigration than Republicans so much that Obama was called Deporter in Chief.

              It is their bill because they are literally signing it. If they had any principles, they would not sign it. If you cannot see that, I am honestly wasting my time with a Democrat cultist.

    • The bipartisan compromise, which featured concessions from both parties, included some wall funding in the hopes of generating GOP support. It was a relatively modest sum — $650 million, roughly 3% of what the Trump administration sought in 2018 — and the funding wasn’t even new. (As Team Harris reminded Axios, the provision “just extended the timeline to spend funds that had been appropriated during Trump’s last year as president.”)

      OP’s username does not check out