Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 somefool   ( @somefool@beehaw.org )  to Technology · 2 years ago

DuckDuckGo’s privacy-focused browser is available for Windows now

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
138
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technews@radiation.party
136
external-link

DuckDuckGo’s privacy-focused browser is available for Windows now

www.theverge.com

 somefool   ( @somefool@beehaw.org )  to Technology · 2 years ago
message-square
138
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technews@radiation.party
DuckDuckGo’s vision of a more private internet now works on all the major computing platforms.
  •  Sordid   ( @Sordid@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe get independence from bing.

    The only alternative to dependence on Bing is dependence on Google. Indexing the entirety of the internet is such an expensive project that there are only two companies on the planet that can afford it.

    •  tiny_electron   ( @tiny_electron@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      •  Sordid   ( @Sordid@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Huh, that’s a relatively new development. It used to just be a reskin of Bing, like DuckDuckGo.

        •  Mogster   ( @Mogster@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It started off using Bing as a fallback if they couldn’t provide enough results from their own index, then they ditched Bing entirely.

    •  BootlegHermit   ( @BootlegHermit@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      @Sordid

      Even then, there’s the theory/circumstantial “evidence” that Google’s indexing is a big farce. Forgot where I saw the video, but someone pointed out that the average person only relies on the 1st page or two of search results. To try to go beyond that, most searches very quickly drop from “millions of results” down to a few hundred/thousand at best. Going beyond the first couple of search result pages, the page count seemingly drops off a cliff.

      However, there are independent engines out there. The first one that pops to mind is Gigablast, which does it’s own indexing/crawling.

      If you’ve got some time to kill, check out some stuff related to the “Dead Internet Theory”. While I cant say how accurate the information presented may be, it certainly opens up the idea that there’s something funky about the internet and how we perceive it.

      •  Spectacle8011   ( @Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        However, there are independent engines out there. The first one that pops to mind is Gigablast, which does it’s own indexing/crawling.

        Gigablast went down 2 months ago. The crawler is available as free software, though.

        Mojeek’s Search Engine Map gives you a good picture of the search engines out there. You can also see Seirdy’s very informative post on all the different search engines out there, which is fairly regularly updated: https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes/

    •  DeflectedBullhorn   ( @DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, Brave seems to have done a good job of it, better results than Google in many cases for me.

    •  tinselpar   ( @tinselpar@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      mojeek has it’s own crawler.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 178 users / day
  • 1.38K users / week
  • 3.11K users / month
  • 6.49K users / 6 months
  • 5.07K local subscribers
  • 40.9K subscribers
  • 5.46K Posts
  • 97.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  rs5th   ( @rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  •  coldredlight   ( @coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Leigh   ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code