superkret ( @superkret@feddit.org ) to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 year agoOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.orgimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1472file-text
arrow-up1472imageOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.org superkret ( @superkret@feddit.org ) to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square66linkfedilinkfile-text
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer_operating_system Author: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Benedikt.Seidl Data from: http://top500.org/stats
minus-square IrritableOcelot ( @IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 year agoGood point. But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
minus-square MajorHavoc ( @MajorHavoc@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHeh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
minus-square AscendantSquid ( @AscendantSquid@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
minus-square MajorHavoc ( @MajorHavoc@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHeh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
minus-square IrritableOcelot ( @IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoOh that was hyperbole, I didn’t expect to be taken literally!
minus-square MajorHavoc ( @MajorHavoc@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoLol. Well good guess. I’m not a primary source or anything, of course. Your comment just matches something I heard once in office gossip.
Good point.
But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
Heh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
I don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
Heh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
Oh that was hyperbole, I didn’t expect to be taken literally!
Lol. Well good guess.
I’m not a primary source or anything, of course. Your comment just matches something I heard once in office gossip.