AgreeableLandscape ( AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml ) M to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agoRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up165file-textcross-posted to: privacyguides@lemmy.onewolnyinternet@szmer.infotechnologylibre_culture@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up165external-linkRed Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreamswww.theregister.comAgreeableLandscape ( AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml ) M to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square36linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacyguides@lemmy.onewolnyinternet@szmer.infotechnologylibre_culture@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
https://web.archive.org/web/20230624163406/https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/23/red_hat_centos_move/
minus-squareV ( vanderbilt@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 years agoYou make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
minus-squareLaser ( Laser@feddit.de ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 years agoOracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”. I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.
You make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.
Oracle might be another one, though I guess that as weird as that sounds, at least they add value by providing their “unbreakable enterprise kernel”.
I guess Oracle will be hit the least as they do have the manpower to make sure their distribution stays RHEL compatible, but at a higher cost.