Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said in rejecting calls for a ban on trans competitors.

    • How does a trans-woman’s socialization compromise competitive integrity? That’s an entirely internal problem, and it doesn’t affect any other competitors. This is really just grabbing for any excuse to be transphobic.

        • No, it isn’t. It’s so women can enter the game without the pressure of going into a tournament setting mostly dominated by men. A trans-woman being in the women’s tournament does not compromise that unless you don’t think trans-woman are women. Being born male does not impact one’s ability to compete in chess, just the accessibility of a competition dominated men. If you’re already in the women’s space, then that issue is entirely moot. A trans-woman faces the same social barrier to competing, and is entitled to the same protected space.

          The only argument against that is if you don’t really think trans-woman are women.

          • verdigris ( verdigris@lemmy.ml ) Banned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t agree that that is the motivation. You’re confusing cause and effect. The competition space is dominated by men because of social and cultural norms, which is why they made a women’s division. It’s not so there’s “less pressure”, it’s so the entire top level of the competition isn’t entirely men and there’s actually a meaningful competition for both groups.

      • verdigris ( verdigris@lemmy.ml ) Banned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hypothetically agree, but note that you’re basically arguing for trans women to compete with men. Just in this scenario bio women also have to. And classically this results in men dominating and women being discouraged from even joining due to factors discussed above.