The system learned to translate brain activity to physical intent after just 30 sentences. Typing speeds reached 22 words per minute with few errors, nearly matching speeds of able-bodied smartphone users.

  • apotheotic (she/her) ( apotheotic@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    An awesome development no doubt, but, 22 wpm is ssslllloooow

    Edit: to be clear, 22wpm is huge for people who were previously unable to type at all, or with any sort of speed. Just weird to call 22wpm “nearly as fast as smartphone users”. (And I know, they’re using smartphone users of that patticular age group as the metric, but the headline is dishonest by omission in this case)

    • TehPers ( TehPers@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      As someone with fat fingers and autocorrect disabled, I wish I had 22 wpm with high accuracy.

      And before you suggest autocorrect, I use a lot of acronyms and jargon that autocorrect often fails at. It gets annoying enough that I’d rather just type stuff out myself.

      • apotheotic (she/her) ( apotheotic@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fair enough! I don’t use autocorrect either, but I guess I don’t have the same problem with my fingers that you’re experiencing.

        I just can’t fathom it taking me nearly three seconds to type a word. I’d be surprised if the majority of words take me even one second to type.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand ( yakko@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love to type fast, but I recognise it’s not as valuable as typing something worth reading. I used to write long emails and it was never really worth a damn in the end. As for writing books, those aren’t the kind of thing you should just firehose onto the page either.