Powderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) to ChatEnglish · 2 months agoI just finished Casablanca, and the thing is so fucking derivative, I can't understand why anyone considers it a classicmessage-squaremessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up116file-text
arrow-up116message-squareI just finished Casablanca, and the thing is so fucking derivative, I can't understand why anyone considers it a classicPowderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) to ChatEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square16linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaret3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoYou successfully Ken M.'d them. :D
minus-squarePowderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoI was hoping using variations of “thing” thrice in two sentences would indicate the tenor. It did not.
minus-squareEvkob (they/them) ( Evkob@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoFor me, it was the use of the word pastiche.
minus-squarePowderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI was thinking of what I wanted for breakfast.
You successfully Ken M.'d them. :D
I was hoping using variations of “thing” thrice in two sentences would indicate the tenor. It did not.
For me, it was the use of the word pastiche.
I was thinking of what I wanted for breakfast.