Than make a post about having a discussion. Not a declarative statement of what needs to happen and a subjective sentiment delivered in objective format. You don’t start a discussion about immediately saying others are wrong.
Than make a post about having a discussion. Not a declarative statement of what needs to happen and a subjective sentiment delivered in objective format. You don’t start a discussion about immediately saying others are wrong.
Every other post is about that site.
It’s like getting a new girlfriend but constantly talking about your ex.
Where is the question? If you were sincere, which I don’t think you are, you could have worded it much better.
For example: “Is it better if we do not talk about that site…?”
I have done that but I am still allowed to have a discussion.
Some people made some valid points against my sentiment, I would not have gotten that had I not posted.
For me it’s important to see opposing views, otherwise what’s the point.
Than make a post about having a discussion. Not a declarative statement of what needs to happen and a subjective sentiment delivered in objective format. You don’t start a discussion about immediately saying others are wrong.
Than make a post about having a discussion. Not a declarative statement of what needs to happen and a subjective sentiment delivered in objective format. You don’t start a discussion about immediately saying others are wrong.
I thought the word can was asking a question. Had I used something like you must stop it would have been different.
Where is the question? If you were sincere, which I don’t think you are, you could have worded it much better. For example: “Is it better if we do not talk about that site…?”