Which is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.comexternal-link twotone ( @twotone@beehaw.org ) Technology • edit-211 months ago message-square82arrow-up1125
arrow-up1125external-linkWhich is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.com twotone ( @twotone@beehaw.org ) Technology • edit-211 months ago message-square82
minus-square jabib (he/him) ( @jabib@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink11•11 months agoPretty sure my Garmin does pace for cycling. You bed to get a multisport watch from them first. The Forerunner watches are going to be focused on running obviously. Fenix line should do average speed
minus-square owf ( @owf@feddit.de ) linkfedilink1•edit-211 months agoThat’s not the Vivoactive cycling app.
minus-square owf ( @owf@feddit.de ) linkfedilink1•edit-211 months agoThey were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed. Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats. It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
minus-square jabib (he/him) ( @jabib@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink1•11 months agoSeems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields. https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/
Pretty sure my Garmin does pace for cycling. You bed to get a multisport watch from them first. The Forerunner watches are going to be focused on running obviously. Fenix line should do average speed
That’s not the Vivoactive cycling app.
They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed.
Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats.
It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
Seems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields.
https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/