- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- privacy@lemmy.ml
Why do people assume Signal messenger isn’t spying on you? Yes, it has open source code, yes it uses end-to-end encryption. But we can’t check which code runs in the version from Google Play or the App Store. And also their APK (IPA) build process is essentially a black box, it doesn’t use GitHub Actions or some other transparent build system. I also heard from Techlore that they add a proprietary part to the apk to filter bots. The only thing I can assume is that people scanned the traffic coming from the app (Android), phone (iOS) and checked whether encryption keys were being sent to Signal or not. But it seems to me that this can be also circumvented. What do you think?
P.S. I myself use Signal to communicate with relatives and friends. Definetly not a hater.
You must log in or register to comment.
Well outside of the general open source and E2EE stuff, there are a few more things.
They’re under a non-profit foundation and charity to which donating is tax-deducatble. That means they have to publicice their financial numbers. Selling data would generate a sudden revenue, which would draw attention.
They also regularily do external audits, both from external audit organisations as individuals. This list was made in august 2022, you can likely find a newer list somewhere. I just did a quick search for you. https://community.signalusers.org/t/overview-of-third-party-security-audits/13243
Signal also runs perfectly fine without anything Google btw. It uses PlayServices only if you have it on your phone (otherwise it just uses WebSockets), as it preserves battery life. However, it doesn’t actually send data to Google over PlayServices. Instead it sends an empty notification, which wakes the phone and is recognised by Signal as a trigger to make it connect to Signal servers to grab data directly from there. If you wish, you can check this in the code yourself. I guess you may also be able to confirm this looking at network traffic from and to your phone.
Also a note on the E2EE. Another important thing is that not only the message is encrypted, but also the metadata. Unlike most other chatapps like WhatsApp; who knows where you are, who you talk to, how often, etc. You could theoretically also check this by checking outgoing traffic if you wish.
This also means that unless they somehow secretly have a copy of your private key, there is no data for them to sell anyways. The fact that even in court they’ve didn’t have data to show, them passing many external audits without this being a point (sometimes issues are found, which is normal. If audits are always perfect I’d be more warry. But never on this point afaik), and that nothing in the code nor internet traffic points to them possibly having this, makes me not that worried about the idea that they secretly got a copy of peoples private keys.
So overal while it’s perhaps technically possible they secretly run something else on their server and build a back door to read your messages, they are many things that show they don’t, and literally nothing that would say they do. And neither does there seem to be any reason why, since they can’t sell it nor give it in court. So unless you believe they have some evil bigger plan, I don’t see the reason to doubt.
And a little note. Privacy people can be crazy, and I say that in a positive way! If you can check it, people no doubt have, and issues would’ve been found. Yet many people deep into it still vouch for it. That says something. And the less crazy people profit of this. This is similar to why many big FOSS projects are considered safe even if you didn’t check all code yourself. And before you say “but if everyone thinks like that”, realise that the craziest don’t trust other people either. While smaller projects could hide perhaps, the real big/famous projects like Signal, Linux, LibreOffice, etc would fall trough as soon as they start doing shit.
Very well composed and thorough explaination. Thank you.
💯
Thank you for the detailed comment!
Well, I think that in such a case it would be possible to bypass the correct accounting of funds. Financial fraud has not been canceled. But this is more of a counterargument, unlikely.
I didn’t know about Google notifications, cool implementation!
Yes, metadata encryption is cool, absolutely!
The question is also how to check the traffic on the iPhone, if there are even no monitoring tools there.
it would be possible to bypass the correct accounting of funds. Financial fraud
Well, sure but it’ll be quite difficult to hide a large increase in revenue still. Large unussual transactions generally have to be flagged by banks, so receiving and moving around revenue of sold data from your non-profit wouldn’t be thát easy unless they only allow crypto or cash. Surely it’s possible, but financial fraud on that level is quite difficult and often falls trough sooner or later. Or, the other option is that they don’t earn that much from it making it easy to hide, but that sounds like a lot of effort and potential risk for little gain.
Either way, the financial numbers is just one of the reasons. But trust is never build on one thing, it’s built on the combination of them. With all things I mentioned, I don’t exactly get the feeling it’s all hanging on finacial fraud.
The question is also how to check the traffic on the iPhone, if there are even no monitoring tools there.
Use a network you controll (like your home WiFi) and check in- and outgoing traffic network wide instead of on-device.
You cannot check other peoples stuff all the time, but I’d suggest not sending sensitive information to people you don’t trust as they could leak it (be it on purpose or not). And depending on level of sensitivity, just speak face-to-face in a private place. There is always a form of digital footprint when doing stuff digital. In the end, you should always assume that nothing is 100% safe, and anything cán be hacked. Trusting digital communication to be 100% safe is foolish. Look at situations like the Encrochat debacle for example. The question is more, which risks are worth it in your threat model. For most people, Signal is good enough as the risks it does have aren’t in their threat model at all.
Thank you! Really good points ❤️
Because they were brought to court to give info for a case and they proved they didn’t have any.
Right! To date, and according to this doc from 2021, they can only provide date and time of account creation and date of last connection.
From whom did this information come, from Signal themselves? It’s like asking a criminal if you stole diamonds in that store at 3 a.m. And again, they may have disclosed these messages to the government, but together they agreed to say that Signal does not have anything. I think we need to think about such things 😉
They’d be jeopardizing everything if they lied in such a situation.
There are still a few companies out there who truly stand for one’s freedom and privacy. Look at what happened to Mullvad VPN, for example. They were raided and there was nothing to be found, because their no-logs policy was actually true.
I mean Signal isn’t a company, its a non profit organization.
Yes, sure. But they’d still jeopardize everything their organization has done and also their own freedom, I guess.
Yeah. Would be idiotic to lie about that.
Yes, I am also inclined to this, if only because they have the same WhatsApp for surveillance.
Maybe. Mullvad situation is same, they told us that they didn’t give any info to police. Same situation as with criminal when you ask him 🙂
This is only for retro-active cases. A judge can perfectly well order them to do live surveillance of users and put it all under a gag-order and have the police ex-filtrate the data so that Signal can still claim they are not storing any of it.
Like all centralized services their claims to privacy are very shallow and the FBI is known to have tried to get paid informants on these large messenger companies to ex-filtrate data even without the above mentioned legal way via a court order.
You are incorrect. They cannot be compelled into developing a feature that does not already exist.
First of all yes they can, and secondly that’s not a new feature but any server has that built in by default. The question is just, is it stored or not.
You can use forks of Signal which removed the proprietary part. For example there is Molly (Hardened Signal) which has two version and one of them is fully foss.
It also lacks transparent build system (GitHub Actions, etc.). And I kinda don’t want some random (good?) guy to build this code. Better using original APKs for me 🙂
Never really thought much of Techlore (no offense if you see this, but to be honest I haven’t even thought to click on a single one of your videos, sorry)…
I use the APK directly from the site and I haven’t heard of this build situation, etc. I also think we could think the same about many other private chat apps — are they really keeping their promises?
My gripe with Signal is that it still needs that phone number to onboard. I know about the forks, and I even used Pigeon on the Punkt phone. Now that Moxie has stepped down from his role at Signal, things may change again.
I guess the best you could get is something like Session or Briar right now? XMPP?
I live in France, and another problem is rearing its head: asking to ban or weaken encryption in the name of national security.
Yeah, we can say this thing about many other private messenger, completely true.
Best options for anonimity and privacy as I see are Session and SimpleX (funding model is suspicious for such a sensitive business, i know).
Privacy news from France are really bad, Europe cares about privacy, yeahyeahyeah.
Europe cares about privacy, yeahyeahyeah.
They care about protecting user data at least, and they have made attempts to keep some of the giants in check. Threads™ isn’t available here yet because of these laws. So with one hand they give us some pretty awesome rights and protection, and with the other they are spying quite a bit.
Eh ECJ is probably killing these idiotic laws again before they go into power. I wish politicians that push that shit (like fucking Achsel Voss) could be taken to prison for being against the constitution of basically every EU Country and EU itself…
Kinda mehmeh situation, I think 😊
Why does Signal need my phone number?
Signal is subject to National Security Letters in the U.S.
Signal received funding from Radio Free Asia owned by the U.S. Agency for Global Media with ties to the CIA.
They seem to have a history of needing quite some time to release the server source code.
Here are some articles to read about Signal:
@smegforbrains Phone numbers are hashed and then used as an identifier. The Hash cannot be used to figure out the original data. NSA letters are useless as they only have sign up and last connection times.
@topsecret_chat @smegforbrains “trust blindly”
my guy, you don’t even release source code.
Hi, the client-code is naturally open, while currently the core-engine is kept highly encrypted and we do not publish it (yet) as open-source.
There are different views with pros & cons about opening it, regarding confidential comms.
Anyway we are independently pen-tested by volunteers. Thanks
I think the reaction to government requests makes them trustworthy. There was virtually no useful data to hand out on their users.
However, I personally don’t like Signal, because to me, the UI / UX is bad. I use Telegram, which is not a messenger for privacy-minded individuals and I know that. But the UI / UX is just so much better and most of my friends and family are on there, so yeah…
Telegram UX is way better. Signal has good UI for me. Signal lacks features.
What like? What is a better feature than privacy?
Privacy is solid “feature”, definetly. It lacks UI color schemes. Some customizability. Stickers. Screen mirroring in calls.
The first 3 are real meh for me. Mirroring I can imagine is useful in some contexts though. I personally don’t need that as much as privacy :).
Agreed. Privacy is in the first place!
Sadly I’m in the same boat. I’ve been trying to switch to Matrix, but telegram is so much better in terms of features. I really miss the shared media and links functionality.
The what functionality?
Each chat on telegram holds a history of shared media, which is separated into tabs for media (pictures and videos), files (any other files, including uncompressed images), links (every shared link, probably the most useful one), music and so on.
It’s really handy if you remember you’ve sent someone a link to an article and don’t want to scroll through 5 months of messages.
Ah, I would favour Signal to Telegram as it has privacy and shared media. In Signal, on a chat, clicking … and All media, you can do that. I can imagine Matrix hasn’t got that level of maturity yet but I haven’t tested.