Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 3 years ago

There’s a new iMessage for Android app — and it actually works

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
41
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemdro.id
78
external-link

There’s a new iMessage for Android app — and it actually works

www.theverge.com

Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 3 years ago
message-square
41
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemdro.id
There’s a new iMessage for Android app — and it actually works
www.theverge.com
external-link
The question is how long Apple will let it.
  • loki ( loki@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    If you use on android apps from the playstore, most apps are built to relay their notifications through Google’s Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM), so they don’t have to have a background notification listeners running 24/7. It also means less overhead from multiple notification listeners from every app having its own. So yes, if an app is built on top of google play services, it requires “google play services”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firebase_Cloud_Messaging

    If an app says it doesn’t rely on google play services, it uses an alternative notification listener or websockets, which might not be as effective, because Google is inbuilt and won’t kill its own apps, the scale of its infrastructure, and its habit of listening on people’s activity.

    Add in Androids habit of killing background services, and you don’t always get your notification when the app isn’t in the foreground.

    Even Signal from Playstore uses Google Play Services for notifications.

    https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/g217a6/what_can_google_glean_from_signal_using_fcmgcm/

    • progandy ( progandy@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      There is also an alternative push protocol called UnifiedPush, but not many of the popular privacy focused messengers care to implement it.

    • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 155 users / day
  • 777 users / week
  • 2.12K users / month
  • 5.18K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.7K subscribers
  • 6.4K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code