Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Mex ( Mex@feddit.uk )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 years ago

Boris Johnson’s Covid WhatsApps: ex-PM ‘can’t remember iPhone password’

www.thetimes.co.uk

external-link
message-square
27
link
fedilink
45
external-link

Boris Johnson’s Covid WhatsApps: ex-PM ‘can’t remember iPhone password’

www.thetimes.co.uk

Mex ( Mex@feddit.uk )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
27
link
fedilink
Boris Johnson has been unable to give WhatsApp messages from his old mobile phone to the Covid inquiry because he cannot remember the passcode, The Times has be
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • frazorth ( frazorth@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    What a twat. So what are the bets on how long it will be until they get proof that he has logged into his phone and this is all bollocks?

    • HipPriest ( HipPriest@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      12 hours, 24 hours something like that?

      Then he’ll say in public something like ‘this is utter and absolute poppy piffle’ and in private he’ll say sorry and think up what his next line of sorry not sorry bs is going to be. It’s what he’s always done.

    • Syldon ( Syldon@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      It is being held at a solicitors. He does not have access to it without. If he requests access, then it will be recorded.

  • Syldon ( Syldon@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 years ago

    Which in it self is an offence. https://www.saunders.co.uk/news/prosecuted-for-your-password/

    • Mex ( Mex@feddit.uk ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      Not that I agree with this law, but it should be applied to our ex PM who brought in similar laws

    • wildeaboutoskar ( wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Would that apply in this kind of thing? I.e it’s not a criminal matter

      • Syldon ( Syldon@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        What you mean as in government asking for your password and you telling them you can’t give it up. OFC it applies. The problem is the impetus from government to enforce the law.

        • wildeaboutoskar ( wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          I meant as in it’s an inquiry not a criminal case, so wasn’t sure how much they could compel someone to release it. If the law is applicable though then yeah it’s not a good look for the government not to be seen to enforce it.

          • Syldon ( Syldon@feddit.uk ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            There does not need to be a criminal offence pending for a search warrant to be issued. There only needs to be evidence that a crime could have been committed. Select committees hold the same weight as a criminal court. There are some ancient laws that are reputed to give them sentencing powers. They now rely on courts to process any wrong doing. It is a similar to the authority of the crown. We know the king can do certain things, but he won’t because of the shit storm it would cause afterwards.

  • smeg ( smeg@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • DJDarren ( DJDarren@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      True, but most people aren’t the former Prime Minister. I can’t read the article, because fuck paying any money to any of Murdoch’s outlets, but is it his personal phone, or one that was provided in his official capacity as PM?

      • smeg ( smeg@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • loobkoob ( loobkoob@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’ll almost certainly be his personal phone. A recurring issue with the tory government has been that they use their personal phones for government business.

    • mackwinston ( mackwinston@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      The thing is if it were you or I being investigated, we’d have the RIP Act thrown at us with the threat of a custodial sentence, no doubt, for not revealing the password.

  • Delascas ( Delascas@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Non paywall version here :

    https://archive.li/09RTm

    • Mex ( Mex@feddit.uk ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      nice! thanks for this.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s definitely 00769.

    I imagine “sorry I forgot my password” comes up a lot in police investigations, I imagine it wouldn’t slow down the computer forensics team much.

    • SNEWSLEYPIES ( SNEWSLEYPIES@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Forget the forensics guys, if he keeps this up they’ll be prepping the rubber hose and dentistry tools guys.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        Perhaps we could skip the forensics?

    • HM King Charles III DG FD ( Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Phones are well encrypted, they need the password

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        No, you can crack them with the right forensic tools, it just costs. I imagine of they tell BoJo they can unlock his phone but they’ll charge him £50k to do it, he’ll “find” his password tucked down the side of a mistress.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD ( Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Only if the phone hasn’t been powered off or “locked-down”

  • Tenebris Nox ( tenebrisnox@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    That photo of Boris is great. No really a ladies’ man… more like my Nan.

    • Mex ( Mex@feddit.uk ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      isn’t that a bit mean on your nan?

      • ivanafterall ( ivanafterall@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        His nan is Margaret Thatcher.

        • Tenebris Nox ( tenebrisnox@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Blimey! I hope not. :)

  • _xDEADBEEF ( _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    And as we all know, we can trust what he says

  • 15liam20 ( 15liam20@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I will save everyone a lot of time, it’s 69420

    The phone can be imaged then brute-forced, I imagine that this is more distraction. I’m not sure how but then I didn’t really understand the whole cardboard bus thing.

United Kingdom@feddit.uk

unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 202 users / day
  • 839 users / week
  • 1.62K users / month
  • 3.64K users / 6 months
  • 90 local subscribers
  • 7.05K subscribers
  • 4.69K Posts
  • 16.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • tom ( tom@feddit.uk ) 
  • GreatAlbatross ( GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ) 
  • frankPodmore ( frankPodmore@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code