Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Lee Duna ( throws_lemy@lemmy.nz )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago

Apple reforms App Store rules to allow third-party payment methods in the U.S. but will still charge a commission fee

www.ghacks.net

external-link
message-square
39
link
fedilink
103
external-link

Apple reforms App Store rules to allow third-party payment methods in the U.S. but will still charge a commission fee

www.ghacks.net

Lee Duna ( throws_lemy@lemmy.nz )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
39
link
fedilink
Apple reforms App Store rules to allow third-party payment methods in the U.S. but will still charge a commission fee - gHacks Tech News
www.ghacks.net
external-link
Apple has adjusted its App Store rules to allow third-party payment methods. But developers will need to pay a commission for using them.
  • originalfrozenbanana ( originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    Why does providing the App Store entitle them to a percentage of in app purchases instead of, say, a fee per download or something?

    • Kidplayer_666 ( Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you think about it, a fee per app download is a lot less flexible when it comes to monetising purchases. Means free apps either become paid or shove into you a lot more micro transactions. That exact model is what made devs get mad at unity (although unity doesn’t provide the download infrastructure and it was on top of a cut)

      • originalfrozenbanana ( originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Fair. I still don’t think that entitles Apple to a cut of purchases in the app, but you’re right that a download fee sucks.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 21 users / day
  • 615 users / week
  • 1.74K users / month
  • 4.89K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.8K subscribers
  • 6.46K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code