Ubuntu’s popularity often makes it the default choice for new Linux users. But there are tons of other Linux operating systems that deserve your attention. As such, I’ve highlighted some Ubuntu alternatives so you can choose based on your needs and requirements—because conformity is boring.

  • bionicjoey ( bionicjoey@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    Debian is in many ways the “deep end”. A big part of its development philosophy is prioritizing their weirdly rigid definition of Free Software and making it hard to install anything that doesn’t fit that. I’m not saying it’s not a good distro, but IDK if it’s beginner friendly.

    • ulterno ( ulterno@lemmy.kde.social ) Banned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Debian is in many ways the “deep end”.

      The first time I tried Debian was when I was new to Linux, on a laptop with both the Ethernet and Wi-Fi unsupported. On top of which, it had an nVidia GPU. It was hard.

      Now I know much more about Linux and checked the Motherboard for Linux support before buying it. Debian works pretty well.

      So, it’s beginner friendly as long as someone helps you out with the installation after checking up on all the stuff you will need to run.

      • bionicjoey ( bionicjoey@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        So, it’s beginner friendly as long as someone helps you out with the installation after checking up on all the stuff you will need to run.

        In other words, it’s not beginner-friendly

        • BaumGeist ( BaumGeist@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I’m just gonna copy from my other reply to ulterno

          Once again overestimating beginners. Any OS installation is inherently not beginner friendly, and requires helping them, regardless of Debian/Arch/Nix/windows/Big Sierra Lion Yosemite III, Esq. Jr. MD or whatever Apple’s calling it nowadays.

          I find Debians defaults during installation very beginner friendly, set and forget type stuff. It won’t use the hardware to full potential, but that’s up to advanced users to decided after they’re comfortable with the training wheels.

      • BaumGeist ( BaumGeist@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        on a laptop with both the Ethernet and Wi-Fi unsupported

        You’re right, it didn’t use to be beginner friendly. The installer has definitely gotten a lot better, and now they’re offering non-free-firmware in it; that avoids that whole issue…

        On top of which, it had an nVidia GPU

        Nouveau comes packaged. Most people that ditch nouveau do so because it doesn’t give them high performance metrics they expected out of their GPU, or it didn’t support multimonitor, or played poorly with RDP or any other issue which goes outside of my “watch youtube on my laptop” use case. That is, once again, deviating outside of “average user” territory. If you had problems getting any display or DE to work, that’s different, but you may find it sucks less now.

        So, it’s beginner friendly as long as someone helps you out with the installation after checking up on all the stuff you will need to run.

        Once again overestimating beginners. Any OS installation is inherently not beginner friendly, and requires helping them, regardless of Debian/Arch/Nix/windows/Big Sierra Lion Yosemite III, Esq. Jr. MD or whatever Apple’s calling it nowadays.

        I find Debians defaults during installation very beginner friendly, set and forget type stuff. It won’t use the hardware to full potential, but that’s up to advanced users to decided after they’re comfortable with the training wheels.