And do believe that I, this random guy on the internet has a soul
I personally don’t believe that I anyone else has a soul. From my standup I don’t se any reason to believe that our consciousness and our so called “soul” would be any more then something our brain is making up.
- LadyLikesSpiders ( @LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml ) 30•8 months ago
I believe that my consciousness is a thing I can point to as being my essence. You could maybe call that a soul, or you could maybe not. Either way, my consciousness is the collective consciousness of countless single-celled organisms all working to make my singular self function. You could maybe call the manifestation of all these processes into a greater thinking singularity as a “soul”, more akin to the way in which a city might have a “soul” made up by the people that live in it. I don’t believe I have a ghost, and I believe that my consciousness is conditional, derived from my biology, but consciousness itself is as good as anything to call a soul
So I guess, in short, no XD
- verdare [he/him] ( @verdare@beehaw.org ) 2•8 months ago
my consciousness is the collective consciousness
THE UNENLIGHTENED MASSES
- WatDabney ( @WatDabney@sopuli.xyz ) 13•8 months ago
No.
I self-evidently have a consciousness (cogito ergo sum), but logic, reason and the available evidence all point to that consciousness being a manifestation of brain activity and shaped by my genetics, environment and experiences, as opposed to an entity unto itself.
- Cowbee [he/him] ( @Cowbee@lemmy.ml ) 11•8 months ago
Nah, I’m just a flesh computer.
- neidu2 ( @neidu2@feddit.nl ) 10•8 months ago
Define to me concretely what constitutes a soul, and I will tell you. Do cats have souls? What about frogs? Snails? Amoebas? Trees? Or people on life support?
I have a self-aware consciousness. If that’s what counts, then yes. However, this means that many people by the same definition don’t.
- Scrubbles ( @scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ) English7•8 months ago
Only correct answer here. First define “soul”. So far no human has ever been able to define it, so how do we know if we have one?
- Dr. Wesker ( @wesker@lemmy.sdf.org ) English10•8 months ago
Whenever I listen to that old-time 'a rock and roll I feel soothed, so I must.
- arefx ( @arefx@lemmy.ml ) 9•8 months ago
No. It’s more religion inspired fairy tale magic.
- rufus ( @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de ) 9•8 months ago
Define “soul” or the answer is entirely meaningless. I’m pretty sure I’m sentient and can feel emotions and think and reason.
- LibertyLizard ( @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ) 8•8 months ago
Souls are just faerie tales people tell themselves to avoid feeling angst around death. There is absolutely no evidence they exist and plenty of evidence they don’t.
- Blackout ( @Blackout@kbin.run ) 8•8 months ago
You can believe in whatever you want but it won’t make it true. Got to have facts and proof before I’d consider it.
- JackGreenEarth ( @JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee ) English7•8 months ago
You’d have to define soul first. I definitely have a subjective experience/consciousness however.
- Adanisi ( @Adanisi@lemmy.zip ) English7•8 months ago
No. It’s religious quackery.
- viking ( @viking@infosec.pub ) 7•8 months ago
No, I think that’s an abstract concept of a consciousness invented by religion to transcend death. It’s a comforting thought, but that’s really it.
- Scott ( @scott@lem.free.as ) English6•8 months ago
No.
- CanadaPlus ( @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ) 6•8 months ago
No and no. Physics is pretty thoroughly buckled down at this point, leaving only some very extreme situations unaccounted for, and it doesn’t really provide a way for us to not be made of meat.
That goes for any other form of mind-body duality and as a result any afterlife, as well.
- belated_frog_pants ( @belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org ) 5•8 months ago
No