- cross-posted to:
- comics@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- comics@programming.dev
I love how JS is just a mutant blob of flesh.
Kanedaaa
Should’ve made s typescript one, that is a mutant blob of flesh with a life jacket on it.
This is awesome. Rust wearing full plate armor to dinner is hilarious… Also what’s up with Scala? lmao
I assume Scala is like a “gateway” (drug) to functional programming by way of also supporting imperative and object oriented paradigms.
Probably more importantly, it runs on the JVM and is designed to interoperate with existing Java code. (FWIW, I actually think they made a major mistake in how they handle
nullJava objects, and that Kotlin did better here; but Kotlin is much newer.)Oh good point I totally forgot it’s a JVM lang.
Ouuu. This makes sense to me, well thought
My experience in going from C to C++ was different: if you’re not converting everything from mallocs with custom addressing systems to the collections framework, you’re not living.
My experience with C++ was when C++ was a relatively new thing. Practically the only notable feature provided by the standard library, was that unholy abuse of bit shift operators for I/O. No standard collections or any other data types.
And every compiler would consider something else a valid C++ code or interpret the same code differently.
I am little bit prejudiced since then… and that is probably where the author is coming from too.
Then things were just getting more complicated (templates and other new syntax quirks), to fill the holes in attempts to make C a ‘high level language’.
deleted by creator
Yeah wtf is up with the overridden bitshifts? Was Stroustroup drunk?
Erlang really is the necromancer’s language.
Why is Swift… like that?
Thanks for a good morning laugh!
deleted by creator
JS, at least, deserves it.
deleted by creator
U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
deleted by creator
any
deleted by creator
Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
A more polished unholy list of depencies?
So, what makes Haskell god tier?
deleted by creator
I think it’s more the idea of being an abstract ideal. It’s totally pure and often mathematical.
Nothing…that’s just how they perceive themselves.
IMO the ackchyually guy would be a better fit for Haskell. “Ackchyually monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors!”
This is epic.
Can anyone explain Java, PHP and Perl to me?
Guess PHP is a server…
That seems to be the consensus. That’s pretty weak, salad people, you know you could have done better.
I love Lisp dialects!








